首页> 外文会议>Biennial Meeting of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists >Effect of sprinkler incorporation timing on the activity of soil-active herbicides applied with glyphosate
【24h】

Effect of sprinkler incorporation timing on the activity of soil-active herbicides applied with glyphosate

机译:喷水灭火剂对草甘膦施用土壤活性除草剂活性的影响

获取原文

摘要

Soil-active herbicides applied in combination with glyphosate can ettectively control a broad-spectrum of weeds, reducing the added selection pressure for glyphosate resistant weeds when using glyphosate alone. Growers have asked how long a soil-applied herbicide can remain on the soil surface before it's incorporated and still be effective. Growing sugar beet in a desert affords the opportunity to explore the effects of overhead irrigation application timing or rainfall has on soil-applied herbicideactivity. A field experiment was conducted at the UI Kimberly Research and Extension Center in 2012, 2013, and 2014 to determine how soon sprinkler incorporation is needed following glyphosate plus soil-active herbicide applications for weed control before the soil-applied herbicides become ineffective. The experimental design was a 4 by 5 factorial RCB with four replications. Incorporation timing treatments were established by waiting 0, 3, 6, or 9 days before incorporation (DBI). All treatments except the untreated control were sprayed with 0.86 kg ha~(-1) glyphosate at the 2-leaf sugar beet growth stage. At the 4- to 6-leaf stage, glyphosate at 0.86 kg ha~(-1) was applied in combination with five soil-active herbicides: s-metolachlor at 1.42 kg ha~(-1), EPTC at 3.36 kg ha~(-1), ethofumesate at 1.12 kg ha~(-1), dimethenamid-P at 0.94 kg ha~(-1), and acetochlor at 1.26 kg ha~(-1). To incorporate the herbicides, 1.25 cm of water was applied over the entire study site. Analysis of the data after combining years showed a significant year effect. Also, there was no DBI by herbicide treatment interaction so the data are presented as main effects by year. The number of DBI varied by weed species. For all weed species averaged across all herbicides, waiting up to 9 DBI, is too long. Weed counts were highest in the 9 DBI treatment. For common lambsquarters, it was best not to wait more than 3 DBI. However, the DBI for green foxtail, wild oats, kochia, annual sowthistle and hairy nightshade was 6 days. When comparing all of the weeds together, delaying incorporation more than 3 days resulted in more weed escapes. For the herbicide main effect, weed densities in response to EPTC averaged across all incorporation dates were highest with common lambsquartersand green foxtail. However, EPTC was surprisingly more stable than originally thought because the weed densities were equal between waiting 3 DBI and 0 DBI. Sugar beet root and ERS yields were very similar in response to DBI and herbicides. When the data were compared within each year, there were no yield differences among the herbicide treatments.
机译:将与草甘膦组合施用于的土壤活性除草剂可以纠正杂散的杂草,减少使用草甘膦单独使用草甘膦时的耐草果抗性杂物的添加选择压力。种植者已经询问土壤施用的除草剂可以在土壤表面纳入并仍然有效的情况下保持多长时间。在沙漠中种植甜菜甜菜提供了机会探索架空灌溉应用时序或降雨对土壤应用的脱脂症的影响。在2012年,2013年的UI Kimberly研究和延伸中心进行了一个田间实验,以确定在草甘膦加上土壤施用除草剂无效之前,在草甘膦加上土壤活性除草剂应用后,需要多久洒水掺入。实验设计是4乘5个因子RCB,具有四种复制。通过在掺入前(DBI)之前等待0,3,6或9天建立掺入定时处理。除了未处理对照外的所有治疗均用0.86千克HA〜(-1)草甘膦在2叶糖甜菜生长阶段喷洒。在4至6叶阶段,在0.86kg Ha〜(-1)的草甘膦与五种土壤活性除草剂组合施用:S-MetOlachlor,1.42 kg Ha〜(-1),EPTC为3.36千克HA〜 (-1),在1.12kg ha〜(-1),二甲基酰胺-p,0.94kg ha〜(-1),乙酰物为1.26kg ha〜(-1)。为了纳入除草剂,在整个研究现场应用1.25厘米的水。组合年后数据分析表现出大量的效果。此外,除草剂处理相互作用没有DBI,因此数据将作为主要效应作为主要效应。杂草物种变化的DBI数量。对于所有除草剂的所有杂草物种平均,等待着9 dbi,太长。杂草计数在9 dBI治疗中最高。对于普通的羊羔排列,最好不要等超过3 dbi。然而,绿色福克斯特,野外燕麦,kochia,年度索道和毛茸茸的夜鹰的DBI是6天。当将所有杂草与一起进行比较时,延迟延迟超过3天导致更多杂草逃脱。对于除草剂的主要效果,杂草密度响应于所有公司所有普及日期的EPTC,含有普通的羊羔散码。然而,EPTC令人惊讶地比最初思想更稳定,因为杂草密度在等待3 dbi和0 dbi之间等于。糖甜菜根和蛋白质响应于DBI和除草剂非常相似。在每年在每年进行数据时,除草剂治疗中没有产量差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号