首页> 外文会议>SPE EP Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference >Evaluating Nontechnical Risks and Opportunities in Site Selection and Routing
【24h】

Evaluating Nontechnical Risks and Opportunities in Site Selection and Routing

机译:评估网站选择和路由中的非技术风险和机遇

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Development of oil and gas projects is frequently affected by non-technical factors such as environmental issues and community opposition. To avoid unintended costs and project delays, these factors must be considered early in project development. This paper presents an approach for integrating environmental, social, economic and technical considerations in facility site selection and routing analyses. The approach is based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and can be applied on a geographic information system (GIS) platform. MCDA supports a collaborative decision-making process that accounts for stakeholder preferences and a broad range of risks and opportunities. The approach relies on the project proponent and subject matter experts to identify decision objectives and criteria that reflect project risks and opportunities. The approach has been applied to compare alternatives as well as to perform geospatial suitability and linear routing analysis. Both spatial (e.g., locations of potential community and environmental receptors) and non-spatial (e.g., community acceptance and regulatory challenges) criteria are considered within the MCDA framework. Two case studies are presented: marine terminal site selection and pipeline routing analysis. The process resulted in the identification of risks and opportunities that are most material to the decision, preferred site and pipeline route, as well as opportunities for improvement. The process can be applied to various types of development project, including water management and logistics planning.
机译:石油和天然气项目的发展经常受环境问题和社区反对等非技术性因素的影响。为避免意外成本和项目延误,必须在项目开发时期考虑这些因素。本文提出了一种综合设施场地选择和路由分析中的环境,社会,经济和技术考虑的方法。该方法基于多标准判定分析(MCDA),可以应用于地理信息系统(GIS)平台。 MCDA支持合作决策过程,占利益相关者偏好以及广泛的风险和机会。该方法依赖于项目推动者和主题专家确定反映项目风险和机会的决策目标和标准。该方法已被应用于比较替代方案以及执行地理空间适用性和线性路由分析。在MCDA框架内考虑了空间(例如,潜在的群落和环境受体的位置)和非空间(例如,社区接受和监管挑战)标准。提出了两种案例研究:海洋终端网站选择和管道路由分析。该过程导致确定了决策,首选地点和管道路线的大多数材料的风险和机会,以及改进的机会。该过程可应用于各种类型的开发项目,包括水管理和物流规划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号