首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Building Resilience, Incorporating >Applications of a 'Whole Community' Framework for Enhancing Community or Campus Resilience
【24h】

Applications of a 'Whole Community' Framework for Enhancing Community or Campus Resilience

机译:“整个社区”框架加强社区或校园恢复力的应用

获取原文

摘要

The Community and Regional Resilience Institute (CARRI) has developed a unique approach to community resilience based on a "Whole Community" concept. It treats communities as a collection of systems, each with its own resilience. CARRI has applied its approach to two kinds of communities: civil communities, and institutions of higher education (IHEs). For both civil communities and IHEs, CARRI carried out a pilot program. For each participant, their leadership directed an assessment of the resilience of the component systems to the types of changes most relevant to that community. Each assessment provided suggestions for filling any gaps identified as part of the assessment. The pilot for the seven IHEs followed that for the seven civil communities and was able to take advantage of lessons learned from the first. These two pilot programs led to the following conclusions: ' CARRI's systems-based approach is both understandable and usable by both types of communities. In practice, it seemed to provide a natural way to look at a community. In general, IHEs were able to make better use of the approach than civil communities. This is due, in part, to the improvements made in the IHE pilot program based on the civil communities' results. However, it also reflects the more hierarchical nature of IHEs, the tighter coupling of systems within an IHE and greater discretion in the use of resources in an IHE. College campuses can be crucial catalysts for enhancing the resilience of civil communities. Leadership is a key, perhaps the key, element in the success of a community resilience initiative.
机译:社区和区域恢复力研究所(CARRI)基于“全社区”概念,为社区恢复力制定了独特的方法。它将社区视为一个系统的集合,每个系统都具有自己的恢复力。奇利已经应用了两种社区的方法:民事社区,以及高等教育机构(IShe)。对于民间社区和金矿,富丽进行了试点计划。对于每个参与者,他们的领导力旨在评估组件系统的恢复力,以与该社区最相关的变化类型。每项评估都提供了填写根据评估的一部分确定的任何差距的建议。七个Ihes的飞行员随后为七个民事社区遵循,能够利用第一个人的经验教训。这两个试点计划导致了以下结论:'Carri的基于系统的方法既可以理解和可用两种类型的社区。在实践中,似乎提供了一种看社区的自然方式。一般来说,金矿能够更好地利用比民事社区的方法。这部分是由于民事社区的结果在IHE试点计划中提出的改进。然而,它还反映了IHE内系统内系统的更严格的耦合以及在IHE中使用资源的更大判断。大学校园可以是促进民事社区的韧性的重要催化剂。领导是一个关键,也许是一个社区恢复力倡议成功的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号