首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Mechatronics, Materials, Chemistry and Computer Engineering >Evaluation of APACHE II Score and QT Interval Dispersion for the Prognosis of Critical Cardiovascular Diseases
【24h】

Evaluation of APACHE II Score and QT Interval Dispersion for the Prognosis of Critical Cardiovascular Diseases

机译:Apache II评分和QT间隔分散对关键心血管疾病预后的评价

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: This pilot study evaluated the APACHE II Score and QT Interval Dispersion for the Prognosis of Critical Cardiovascular Diseases. Materials and methods:A total of 217 Critically ill patients with cardiovascular disease were Selected in the Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital Cardiology CCU from January 2016 to January 2017. Patients were divided into death group and survival group according to the their survival situation. APACHE II Score and QT Interval Dispersion of the patients entering the CCU were recorded separately. Results:The APACHE II score and QTd value in death group were significantly higher than those of survival group (P <0.05). The higher the APACHE II score and the QTd value, the higher the mortality rate, and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (p <0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the combined score, the APACHE II score and the QTd score (P <0.05). AUC of the combined score was greater than APACHE II score. Conclusion: The combined score, APACHE II score and QTd score were significantly higher in the death group. Combined score and APACHE II score were more accurate than QT dispersion to predict the mortality of critically ill patients with cardiovascular disease. The combined score was slightly higher than the APACHE II score to predict accuracy of critical cardiovascular disease. And APACHE II score in the specificity slightly stronger than the combined score.
机译:介绍:该试点研究评估了Apache II评分和QT间隔分散,用于关键心血管疾病的预后。材料和方法:在2016年1月至2017年1月,在首都医科大学宣武医院心脏病学CCU中共用了217名患有心血管疾病的患者。患者根据其生存情况分为死亡组和生存组。 Apache II评分和进入CCU的患者的QT间隔分散分别记录。结果:死亡组Apache II得分和QTD值显着高于存活组(P <0.05)。 Apache II得分越高,QTD值越高,死亡率越高,群体之间的差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。组合得分,Apache II得分和QTD得分之间存在统计学上显着差异(P <0.05)。组合得分的AUC大于Apache II得分。结论:死亡群体中的分数,Apache II得分和QTD评分显着高得多。组合得分和Apache II得分比QT分散更准确,以预测批判性心血管疾病患者的死亡率。组合得分略高于Apache II得分,以预测关键心血管疾病的准确性。和Apache II的比分略高于组合得分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号