【24h】

Causality Analysis on Macroeconomic Variables: GDP and Four Key Factors

机译:宏观经济变量因果区分析:GDP和四个关键因素

获取原文

摘要

Causal relationships between different economic variables are of great significance. Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular methods to explore causal influence in complex systems. It has been widely applied to economic variables. In 2011, Hu et. al pointed out shortcomings and/or limitations of GC by using a series of illustrative examples and showed that GC is only a causality definition in the sense of Granger and does not reflect real causality at all, and meanwhile proposed a new causality (NC) shown to be more reasonable and understandable than GC. It is a common belief that the factors related to one country's economic growth mainly include consumption, investment, imports and exports. In this paper, we select these five economic variables from five countries, America, France, Spain, Australia and China. We then apply GC and NC method to these data and find that i) the causal influence from consumption among all factors to GDP is the largest in all selected countries. ii) our results imply that NC method is more exact to reveal the causal influence between different economic variables than GC method. So, we believe that NC method will replaced GC method and will be widely applied to economics and many other fields.
机译:不同经济变量之间的因果关系具有重要意义。格兰杰因果关系(GC)是探索复杂系统中因果影响的最受欢迎的方法之一。它已被广泛应用于经济变量。 2011年,胡等。 AL通过使用一系列说明性示例指出了GC的缺点和/或局限性,并且显示GC只是格兰杰感的因果关系,并且根本不反映真正的因果关系,同时提出了一种新的因果关系(NC)比GC更合理和理解。常见的信念是,与一个国家的经济增长有关的因素主要包括消费,投资,进出口。在本文中,我们从五个国家,美国,法国,西班牙,澳大利亚和中国选择这五个经济变量。然后,我们将GC和NC方法应用于这些数据,并发现i)所有因素之间的因果影响到GDP中最大的因素最大。 ii)我们的结果意味着NC方法更准确地揭示不同经济变量与GC方法之间的因果影响。因此,我们认为NC方法将更换GC方法,并将被广泛应用于经济学和许多其他领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号