首页> 外文会议>Global Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Tourism >ZSocio-Economic Convergence in the EU at National and Regional Level
【24h】

ZSocio-Economic Convergence in the EU at National and Regional Level

机译:国家和区域一级欧盟的Zsocio-经济趋同

获取原文

摘要

Problem Statement. There are concerns that convergence in the EU is mostly economic, which may lead to increased inequality and social disparities. Also, research shows that mild divergence can be observed at regional level, which questions the effectiveness of the EU cohesion policy. Purpose of Study. This paper explores whether socio-economic convergence occurs at both national and regional level, and whether the EU cohesion policy is effective. Methods. Using Eurostat data since 2000, we use coefficients of variation to analyze convergence for disposable income, unemployment rates, proportion of people living in households with low work intensity, and migration. Findings and Results. Convergence and divergence are faster at country level, and trends at national level are mostly different than those at regional level in terms of direction and magnitude. For unemployment rates and work intensity, regional data shows more volatility, indicating higher within-country volatility, while between-country volatility is higher for incomes and net migration. Except for unemployment, the Great Recession has not induced an erosion on the convergence observed in the pre-crisis period;; in particular, low work intensity holds steady. Greater volatility in internal migration is unexpected given the convergence in income and unemployment rate. Conclusions and Recommendations. Most findings point out that the EU cohesion policy is effective in reducing socio-economic disparities before 2008, and containing them doing the Great Depression. However, this is mostly due to increased between-country convergence. Divergence in internal migration is unexpected and requires further research.
机译:问题陈述。担心欧盟的收敛主要是经济,这可能导致不平等和社会差异增加。此外,研究表明,在区域一级可以观察到轻度分歧,这对欧盟凝聚力政策的有效性提出了问题。学习的目的。本文探讨了国家和区域一级的社会经济融合是否发生,以及欧盟凝聚力政策是否有效。方法。自2000年以来使用欧盟统计数据数据,我们使用变异系数来分析可支配收入,失业率,居住在低工作强度的家庭中的人们比例和移民的融合。调查结果和结果。趋势和分歧的趋势和分歧更快,国家层面的趋势大多于方向和规模方面的区域一级。对于失业率和工作强度,区域数据显示出更多的波动性,表明在国内波动中更高,而国内波动性较高,因为收入和净迁移更高。除了失业外,巨额经济衰退尚未诱导危机前期观察到的收敛侵蚀;特别是,低工作强度保持稳定。鉴于收入和失业率的收敛性,内部迁移中的更大波动是意外的。结论和建议。大多数发现指出,欧盟凝聚力政策在2008年之前减少了社会经济差异,并将其含有大萧条。然而,这主要是由于国家之间的融合之间的增加。内部迁移的分歧是意外的,需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号