首页> 外文会议>Meeting of the American Wood Protection Association >AWPA or ICC-ES Listing: 'Which Way Do I Go?
【24h】

AWPA or ICC-ES Listing: 'Which Way Do I Go?

机译:AWPA或ICC-es上市:“我去哪条路?

获取原文

摘要

There are currently two procedures to obtain preservative product listings suitable for building code purposes: an AWPA listing or an ICC-ES Evaluation Service Report. Both procedures for obtaining a listing rely on AWPA or ASTM test methodologies andrequire essentially the same data to be submitted. However there are a number of subtle and not so subtle differences that provide a rationale for logically choosing between the procedures. This paper gives a detailed comparison of listing options whichresult in preservative treated wood being acceptable for building code officials and consumers.
机译:目前有两种程序可以获得适用于建设代码的防腐产品列表:AWPA列表或ICC-ES评估服务报告。从AWPA或ASTM测试方法获得列表的这两种程序都基本上提交了相同的数据。然而,存在许多微妙,而不是如此微妙的差异,提供了用于在程序之间逻辑上选择的理由。本文详细比较了清单选项,这些选项在建设官方和消费者的消费者官员可以接受的保存治疗木材中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号