首页> 外文会议>SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference >Best Practice of Using Empirical Methods for Production Forecast and EUR Estimation in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs
【24h】

Best Practice of Using Empirical Methods for Production Forecast and EUR Estimation in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs

机译:利用生产预测和欧元估计在紧密/页岩气藏的最佳实践

获取原文

摘要

Since 2008, a number of new empirical methods have been introduced to the petroleum industry, specifically for gas wells in tight and shale reservoirs. Among them, Valko's Stretch Exponential Production Decline (SEPD) and Duong's Rate Decline for Fractured Dominated Reservoir are two most mentioned methods by industry experts. These two methods are claimed to be accurate in both tight and shale gas wells. However, since the reservoir rock permeability in those reservoirs ranges from 0.1 to 0.0001 mD in tight gas to less than 0.0001 mD in shale gas, are these two empirical methods still applicable in all ranges of permeability? This paper presents the results of an evaluation study by applying these two empirical methods to tight and shale gas wells under a wide range of permeability generated based on both actual and synthetic production data. The key findings and recommended improvements resulted from the study are: 1. Both SEPD and Duong's Rate-Decline Methods are not applicable to tight gas reservoirs with a permeability ranging from 0.1 to O.OOlmD. Duong's Rate Decline Method will significantly over-estimate EUR whereas SEPD will most likely mismatch the production history as well as yielding a lower EUR while using its Recovery Potential Curve to find parameters. 2. A Modified SEPD Method (YM-SEPD) developed by the author is a much easier and versatile method to use, and most importantly it will yield a more reliable production forecast and EUR estimation. 3 With respect to reservoirs with rock permeability less than O.OlmD, a more rigorous step-by-step work flow using Duong's Method has been proposed. Moreover, for tight gas reservoirs Duong's Method can only be used for production forecast during early years, prior to pseudo-steady state (PSS) flow. 4 Hundreds of horizontal wells including both oil and gas wells, from various formations (Cadomin, Montney, Notikewin, Cardium, etc. in Canada) and under different hydraulic fracturing conditions, have been analyzed using these three different methods. Results indicate that the new YM-SEPD Method will yield a more reliable EUR as well as production forecast in comparison with other two methods, especially when there is only less than 2~3 years of production history. 5 For wells having less than 2 years of production history, the YM-SEPD Method will also be able to yield a reasonable prediction by coupling with Duong's Decline Method
机译:自2008年以来,已经向石油工业引入了许多新的经验方法,专门针对耐燃气井和页岩水库。其中,Valko的拉伸指数产量下降(SEPD)和Duong的裂缝主导水库的速度下降是行业专家最​​多的两种方法。据称这两种方法都是紧密和页岩气井的准确性。但是,由于这些储层中的储层岩石渗透率在较紧的气体中的范围为0.1至0.0001 md,因此在页岩气中的储气量小于0.0001米,这两个​​实证方法仍适用于所有渗透性范围?本文通过在基于实际和合成生产数据产生的广泛渗透率下将这两个经验方法应用于紧密和页岩气井来提供评估研究的结果。该研究产生的主要发现和推荐的改进是:1。萼片和Duong的速率下降方法都不适用于磁性储层,渗透率为0.1至O.OOLMD。 Duong的速率下降方法将显着过度估计欧元,而SEPD将很可能不匹配生产历史,并在利用其恢复潜在曲线找到参数时产生较低的欧元。 2.由作者开发的修改的SEPD方法(YM-SEPD)是一种更容易和多功能的方法,最重要的是它将产生更可靠的生产预测和欧元估计。 3关于储存器的储层小于O.OLMD,已经提出了使用Duong方法的更严格的逐步工作流程。此外,对于纯气液储层,Duong的方法只能用于在伪稳态(PSS)流之前的早期生产预测。已经使用这三种不同的方法分析了40多种水平井,包括石油和天然气井,来自各种地层(Cadomin,Montney,Notikewin,Carlaada)以及在不同的水力压裂条件下进行了不同的水力压裂条件。结果表明,与其他两种方法相比,新的YM-SEPD方法将产生更可靠的欧元以及生产预测,特别是当只有不到2〜3年的生产历史时。 5对于不到2年的生产历史的孔,YM-SEPD方法也能够通过与Duong的衰减方法耦合来产生合理的预测

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号