首页> 外文会议>Intelligent Energy International Conference >Profit and Loss at the Wellhead; Producing from the Wells that are Profitable and Shutting-in the Loss-makers
【24h】

Profit and Loss at the Wellhead; Producing from the Wells that are Profitable and Shutting-in the Loss-makers

机译:井口的损失;从损失和关闭损失制造商的井中生产

获取原文

摘要

In traditional Digital Oilfield programs, it is assumed that increasing production from any given well has a positive impact on the operator's bottom-line. In fact, optimum profitability for a field is dependent not just on production volume, but also on the individual contribution of each well to the overall profitability of the organization. Understanding the contribution of each well, and operating based on this knowledge, can provide significant benefits over and above traditional production optimization techniques. Specifically, it can allow the field operations team to prioritize highest profitability wells - rather than just highest flow wells - and can even allow the identification of seemingly 'productive' wells which actually have an overall negative contribution to the organizations bottom line. To calculate well -by-well profitability, operators must not only be able to accurately measure/allocate production volume, but must also consider other factors such as water handling cost, ongoing maintenance cost , production sharing agreement impact, short and long-term pricing contracts, etc. These and many other factors all contribute to the financial benefits accrued from a given well. Understanding the contribution of any well or group of to the profitability of an operator is therefore more complex than simply calculating the production flow for the day and multiplying by the prevailing price for WTI or Brent. The data necessary to calculate well-by-well contribution is spread across many siloed systems, including production, maintenance and financial applications. At best, operators review production volumes monthly to produce revenue figures when some sort of contribution figure may be possible to calculate. However it rare for any operator to manage cost information at the resolution necessary to calculate P&L accurately, so there has not been the ability to manage daily operations based on well-by-well profitability. Instead, operators have typically calculated a broad 'field lifting cost' and applied this across wells. Clearly, with the high-well counts and heterogeneous production fields that are increasingly common, the potential value to manage wells on a full fiscal calculation rather than just cost can offer significant benefits. This paper discusses the main contributing factors to well profitability, the potential business value from operating on well- P&L versus traditional volume-based approaches and describes solutions to achieve this capability.
机译:在传统的数字油田计划中,假设从任何给定良好的生产良好的生产增加了对操作员的底线的积极影响。事实上,一个领域的最佳盈利能力不仅依赖于生产量,而且还依赖于每个孔对组织的整体盈利能力的个人贡献。了解每个井的贡献,并根据这些知识进行操作,可以提供超越传统生产优化技术的显着优势。具体来说,它可以允许现场操作团队优先考虑最高盈利能力井 - 而不是最高流量井 - 并且甚至可以识别看似“有效”的井,这实际上对组织底线具有整体负面贡献。为了计算以及逐良好的盈利能力,运营商必须不仅能够准确地测量/分配产量,而且还必须考虑其他因素,如水处理成本,后续维护成本,产量分成协议的影响,短期和长期的价格合同等。这些和许多其他因素都有助于从给特定井的经济福利。因此,了解操作员盈利能力的贡献,因此比简单地计算日期的生产流程,并通过WTI或布伦特的流行价格乘以乘法。计算良好良好贡献所需的数据是在许多淤泥系统上传播,包括生产,维护和金融应用。最多,运营商每月审查生产卷以产生收入数据,当某种贡献人物可以进行计算时。然而,任何运营商都罕见地管理成本信息,以准确计算P&L所需的分辨率,因此没有能够基于良好的盈利能力来管理日常运营。相反,运营商通常计算了广泛的“现场提升成本”并应用于井中。显然,随着越来越普遍的高井计数和异构生产领域,在完全财政计算中管理井的潜在价值而不是成本可以提供显着的好处。本文讨论了良好盈利能力的主要贡献因素,潜在的业务价值从康复的良好操作与传统批量的方法,并描述了实现这种能力的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号