首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress and Exhibition >Methodology Development for Fatigue Analysis of Crankcase Mounting for Stress Member Type Motorcycle Frame Subjected to Vehicle Dynamic loads
【24h】

Methodology Development for Fatigue Analysis of Crankcase Mounting for Stress Member Type Motorcycle Frame Subjected to Vehicle Dynamic loads

机译:曲轴箱疲劳分析方法的疲劳分析型摩托车架对车辆动态负荷的摩托车框架

获取原文

摘要

This paper depict the difference in the endurance factor of safety with usage of static and quasi static FE analysis and corrective measures take to solve the problem. The importance of the dynamic loading and subsequent effect of it on the multi axial fatigue analysis. Considering the modern trend prevailing among the vehicle manufacturers and specifically talking about two wheeler industry, it is clear that while the engine remains the same but the frame is changed to cater the market with new models to cut down on the development time. Initially the crankcase was designed for a double cradle frame where the crankcase was mounted on the frame. Later, the frame design was changed to single cradle where engine acts as a stress member link. This kind of arrangement makes the crankcase mountings participate in the chassis loads. Therefore, the crankcase mounting experiences road loads when the vehicle encounter the road irregularities. Earlier the design was verified by static simulation, where the maximum force and the moment were applied for FEA analysis, the results of which couldn’t capture the fluctuation in the load and resulting in greater FOS. The quasi static analysis generated cyclic stress files which was used to determine the endurance factor of safety. The results showed very low factor of safety and thus, the existing crankcase mounting could not be used for the stress member proposal. The mounting were required to be modified to increase the endurance factor of safety. The mounting were brought closer to the crankcase and were reinforced with ribs. This helped us to use same crankcase for different type of frames.
机译:本文描绘了静态和准静态FE分析和纠正措施的使用情况下安全耐力因子的差异,以解决问题。动态载荷和随后对多轴疲劳分析的重要性。考虑到车辆制造商中的现代趋势,并专门谈论两个惠勒行业,很明显,而发动机保持相同,但框架被改变为迎合市场,以削减开发时间。最初,曲轴箱设计用于双摇篮框架,其中曲轴箱安装在框架上。后来,框架设计改变为单个摇篮,发动机充当应力构件链接。这种布置使曲轴箱安装件参与底盘负荷。因此,当车辆遇到道路不规则时,曲轴箱安装经历道路载荷。早些时候,设计通过静态模拟验证,其中最大力量和当下用于FEA分析,其结果无法捕获负载中的波动并导致更大的FOS。准静态分析产生的循环应力文件用于确定安全耐力因子。结果表明,安全性极低,因此,现有的曲轴箱安装不能用于应力构件提案。需要修改安装以增加安全耐力因子。将安装更靠近曲轴箱,并用肋骨加固。这有助于我们使用相同的曲轴箱进行不同类型的帧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号