首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress and Exhibition >Development Of A Practical Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) Algorithm For Vehicle Body Design
【24h】

Development Of A Practical Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) Algorithm For Vehicle Body Design

机译:车身设计实用多学科设计优化(MDO)算法的开发

获取原文

摘要

The present work is concerned with the objective of developing a process for practical multi-disciplinary design optimization (MDO). The main goal adopted here is to minimize the weight of a vehicle body structure meeting NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness), durability, and crash safety targets. Initially, for simplicity a square tube is taken for the study. The design variables considered in the study are width, thickness and yield strength of the tube. Using the Response Surface Method (RSM) and the Design Of Experiments (DOE) technique, second order polynomial response surfaces are generated for prediction of the structural performance parameters such as lowest modal frequency, fatigue life, and peak deceleration value. The optimum solution is then obtained by using traditional gradient-based search algorithm functionality “fmincon” in commercial Matlab package. The stated goal of optimization can also be achieved using a practical MDO methodology in which a substantially reduced set of cases need to be considered leading to a computationally efficient solution. The results of both the RSM-based and practical MDO methods are compared and it has been found that the current practical MDO methodology is substantially more efficient when compared to RSM-based optimization and predicts nearly the same solution as the latter. The practical MDO process is finally implemented on a real-world problem taking a full vehicle design problem as an example and the efficacy of the practical approach is demonstrated. It has been found that, using both the methods, a weight reduction of 16% with respect to the baseline design can be obtained and values of design variables yielded by the practical MDO methodology are nearly same as that of the RSM-based weight optimization technique. However, the practical MDO approach does not rely on response surfaces and has significantly higher throughput with a reduction in computation time of 76% as compared to the RSM-based method which requires further analysis for convergence.
机译:目前的工作是关于客观发展实际多学科设计优化(MDO)的过程中。这里采用的主要目标是尽量减少车身结构NVH会议(噪声,振动和声振粗糙度),耐久性和碰撞安全性指标的权重。最初,为了简单起见,方形管被取为研究对象。在研究中考虑的设计变量为宽度,厚度和管的屈服强度。使用响应面方法(RSM)和实验设计(DOE)技术,针对的结构性能参数预测产生二阶多项式响应表面,如最低的模态频率,疲劳寿命,和峰值减速度值。最佳的解决方案,然后通过在商业matlab程序包使用传统的基于梯度的搜索算法的功能“fmincon”获得。也可以用实际的MDO方法,在哪些情况下的一组大幅减少需要考虑导致计算效率的解决方案实现优化的既定目标。结果两个RSM基和实用MDO方法进行了比较,并已经发现,相比于基于RSM-优化在当前实际MDO方法是显着更高效,并预测几乎相同的溶液作为后者。实际MDO工艺上采取了整车的设计问题作为一个例子,实际的方法的功效表现出真实世界的问题终于实现。已经发现的是,使用这两种方法,相对于所述基线设计的重量减少为16%,可以得到与由实际MDO方法得到设计变量的值几乎相同,基于RSM-重量优化技术的。然而,实际的MDO方法不依赖于响应面,并且具有显著更高的吞吐量,在76%的计算时间的减少相比,这需要收敛进一步分析基于RSM-方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号