首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Clinical Image-Based Procedures: From Planning to Intervention >Comparison of Rigid Registration Methods in Four Clinical Scenarios
【24h】

Comparison of Rigid Registration Methods in Four Clinical Scenarios

机译:四种临床情景中刚性登记方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Deformable registration algorithms need in general an appropriate initialization of the volumes that is made by rigid registration algorithms. Very often intensity based rigid registration algorithms are used which provide a good initialization for certain deformable algorithms. However when the algorithm to be used for the deformation is based on a physical approach in which forces are applied to different points of the volume those rigid registration algorithms are not the most appropriate. In this paper we present a comparison between three rigid registration approaches (distance based, curvature based and combination) which detect the areas that are highly deformed and remove them from the calculation of the initial transformation. Its usability is analyzed in four clinical scenarios, namely: livers with large deformations due to breathing, livers before and after tumor ablation, resections and open liver surgery. The results show that the combination approach performs better than the other two in cases when a tumor has been resected.
机译:一般需要可变形的登记算法需要刚性登记算法制造的卷的适当初始化。使用基于强度的强度的刚性登记算法,其为某些可变形算法提供了良好的初始化。然而,当用于变形的算法基于这样的物理方法,其中力被施加到体积的不同点,那些刚性配准算法不是最合适的。在本文中,我们在三个刚性登记方法(基于距离,曲率和组合)之间的比较,该方法检测高度变形的区域并从初始变换的计算中移除它们。其可用性在四种临床情景中分析,即:由于呼吸,肿瘤消融,切除和开放性肝脏手术之前和之后,具有大变形的肝脏。结果表明,在切除肿瘤时,组合方法比其他两种情况更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号