首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Geometry and Graphics >GRAPHICS LITERACY EVALUATION THROUGH INTERPRETING ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS: 3D MODEL OR 2D DRAWING
【24h】

GRAPHICS LITERACY EVALUATION THROUGH INTERPRETING ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS: 3D MODEL OR 2D DRAWING

机译:图形识字评估通过解释装配图:3D模型或2D绘图

获取原文

摘要

During the Spring 2011 semester, an engineering graphics literacy assessment was developed by a visiting Fulbright Scholar at North Carolina State University (NCSU). The assessment was developed for constraint-based modeling course and tested at NCSU. The faculty from four other universities joined the project to test this methodology. The students from Latvia University of Agriculture and later during the Fall 2011 semester the students from Riga Technical University participated in the test using SolidWorks 3D modeling software. The group of students at University of Rijeka in Spring 2011 used AutoCAD 3D modeling software, but the students at Siberian State Automobile and Highway Academy used 2D drafting software Kompas. All the 98 students from five universities were asked to create 3D models or make working drawings for seven parts given in an assembly drawing of a device within two hours time period. The parts in the assembly ranged in complexity from a simple ball to a complex valve body. Students were given a ruler to measure parts on the B-size third quadrant (A3 size first quadrant for Europe) drawing and determine sizes of geometric elements based on the given scale (2:1). There was a positive relationship between the scores on the activity and the pace at which each student completed the parts. It was difficult to compare the test scores on the modeling assessment and other measures in the course (final project, final exam, and final course average) because universities have different grading system. This paper summarizes how students performed on the assessment (number of parts correctly modeled, scores, total time, etc.), reports analyses of relationships between their scores on the assessment and other measures in the course, and also presents ideas for future studies. Average test scores in four universities were significantly lower than in Latvia University of Agriculture where the students had much extensive descriptive geometry and engineering graphics background.
机译:2011年春季学期期间,北卡罗来纳州立大学(NCSU)的访问富布赖特学者开发了一种工程图形扫盲评估。为基于约束的建模课程开发了评估,并在NCSU进行了测试。来自其他四所大学的教师加入了该项目来测试该方法。来自拉脱维亚农业大学的学生和2011年秋季的学生,来自里加技术大学的学生使用SolidWorks 3D建模软件参加了测试。 2011年春季里耶卡大学学生组使用了AutoCAD 3D建模软件,但西伯利亚国家汽车和高速公路学院的学生使用了2D起草软件Kompas。从五所大学的所有98名学生都被要求创建3D模型或制作工作图纸,以便在两个小时内在设备的装配图中提供七个部分。组件中的部件从一个简单的球到复杂的阀体的复杂性范围内。学生们获得了一个标尺,以测量B型第三象限(A3尺寸的欧洲A3尺寸第一次象限)绘制的零件,并根据给定的比例(2:1)确定几何元素的大小。活动与每个学生完成零件的比分之间存在积极的关系。很难将测试分数与课程中的建模评估和其他措施进行比较(最终项目,期末考试和最终课程),因为大学有不同的评分系统。本文总结了学生在评估中进行的学生(正确建模,分数,总时间等的零件数量),报告了他们在课程中评估和其他措施之间的分数之间的关系分析,并提出了未来研究的想法。四所大学的平均测试分数明显低于拉脱维亚农业大学,学生具有多大的描述性几何和工程图形背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号