【24h】

The Prohibition of Ethnic Profiling

机译:禁止民族分析

获取原文

摘要

'Ethnic Profiling' is the use of an individual's race or ethnicity by law enforcement personnel as a key factor in deciding whether to engage in enforcement. The practice is controversial and is illegal in most jurisdictions. Although Article 14 of the European Convention of Human Rights clearly states that any discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, color, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or status is forbidden, law enforcement official often claim that effective policing is not possible without using such indicators. This assertion is supported by the affirmation, that police work is effective when such indicators are used and furthermore is ineffective or even impossible when all citizens would be treated equally. Especially after the 9/11 attacks 'Ethnic Profiling' was considered as an effective means to combat terrorists and indeed US measures over a long period of time have successfully averted any successful incident on US American soil. This approach was copied by several countries although the preconditions in these countries were dissimilar and sometimes combating terrorism was not the real goal behind these measures. The presentation firstly will clarify the legal situation especially in Europe and consequently explain what have to be considered as Ethnic Profiling and what not. Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights will be incorporated in this evaluation. Eventually the effectiveness of Ethnic Profiling will be analyzed. The presentation is not aimed to discredit contemporary policing; it should rather sensitize law enforcement officials and their superiors about the consequences of their acting.
机译:“种族分析”是通过执法人员使用个人的种族或种族作为决定是否参与执法的关键因素。这种做法是争议的,在大多数司法管辖区内是非法的。虽然“欧洲人权公约”第14条明确指出,对性别,种族,颜色,语言,宗教,政治或其他意见,国家或社会起源,与国家少数民族,财产,出生或出生协会的任何歧视禁止地位,执法官员通常声称,不使用此类指标无法进行有效的政策。这一主张得到了肯定的支持,警察工作在使用这些指标时有效,而且当所有公民都相应地对待时,甚至不可能。特别是在9/11袭击“种族分析”之后被认为是打击恐怖分子的有效手段,并且在很长一段时间内的美国措施成功地避免了美国美国土壤的任何成功事件。虽然这些国家的前提是不同的,但有时打击恐怖主义的前提是这些措施的实际目标是若干国家的复制。这位演讲首先将澄清特别在欧洲的法律情况,从而解释必须被视为种族分析以及没有的东西。欧洲人权法院的管辖权将纳入本评估。最终将分析种族分析的有效性。演示文稿并非旨在诋毁当代警务;它宁愿敏感执法官员及其上级对其行为的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号