首页> 外文会议>WLF 2011 >Statistic Versus Deterministic Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
【24h】

Statistic Versus Deterministic Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

机译:滑坡敏感性映射统计与确定性方法

获取原文

摘要

The present work aims to assess the landslide susceptibility of a hilly area, using two methods: the weight of evidence statistical method (WOE) that is based on bivariate statistical analysis and the deterministic approach based on the infinite slope model. To document the efficiency of this quantitative methods, a landslide prone area along Prahova Subcarpathian Valley was chosen, where landslide hazard interacts with human settlement and activities. The Landslide susceptibility map derived from the WOE method has been compared with that produced from the deterministic method and the results analyzed. The values obtained were also in good agreement with the field observations. Results show that the main controlling factors in the evolution of landslides are the slope gradient, saturation condition and lithology. Beside these, factors like morphography (slope aspect and flow direction) or human intervention (land use, roads, buildings) can interfere.
机译:目前的工作旨在利用两种方法来评估丘陵地区的滑坡易感性:基于双变型统计分析的证据统计方法(WOE)的重量和基于无限斜坡模型的确定性方法。为了记录这种定量方法的效率,选择了Prahova Subcarpath山谷的滑坡俯卧面积,其中滑坡危害与人类沉降和活动相互作用。与从确定性方法产生的山体滑坡敏感性图已经比较了从确定性方法产生的结果和分析结果。所获得的值也与现场观察吻合良好。结果表明,山体滑坡演化中的主要控制因素是坡梯度,饱和条件和岩性。除此之外,形态(斜坡方面和流动方向)或人为干预(土地使用,道路,建筑物)等因素会干扰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号