首页> 外文会议>Fall Technical Meeting of the Rubber Division, American Chemical Society >Failure Analysis of Rubber Materials Using Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography/Mass-Spectrometry and Nitrogen Phosphorus Detector(PY-GC/MS/NPD)
【24h】

Failure Analysis of Rubber Materials Using Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography/Mass-Spectrometry and Nitrogen Phosphorus Detector(PY-GC/MS/NPD)

机译:热解气相色谱/质谱和氮磷检测器橡胶材料的失效分析(PY-GC / MS / NPD)

获取原文

摘要

Subtle differences in rubber formulations are common,but they rarely influence the overall performance of the final product.However,there are instances where the product will’suddenly’be more brittle,easily deformed or fail in routine use.When this occurs,the search for differences begins.Detailed analyses of the”good”and”bad”rubbers will often reveal differences in the additive package,the presence of unwanted contaminants or unexpected chemical linkages.Frontier Lab has developed a method map that guides the analyst through the maze of GC analytical techniques used to characterize the rubber materials and perform failure analysis.In this study,two rubber pump diaphragms are used to demonstrate how the method map using the multi-shot pyrolyzer enables an analyst to quickly and efficiently characterize rubber materials.The”Good”sample lasted>1200 hours before failure while the”Bad”sample lasted<800 hours before failure.Failure was defined when the diaphragm cracked and ceased to function.The question being asked is:”These two rubber samples perform differently;is there a difference in the chemical composition of the two samples?”To answer this question,Pyrolysis technique with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry,as well as Nitrogen Phosphorus Detector will be used.Multiple pyrolyzer modes,such as Evolved Gas Analysis(EGA)and Heart Cutting(HC)analyses will be performed to characterize the differences between the two rubber samples.In addition,a novel approach of using a Pyrolyzer as the sample introduction technique followed by simultaneous data acquisition by multiple GC detectors(MS/NPD)will be demonstrated.
机译:橡胶配方的微妙差异是常见的,但它们很少影响最终产品的整体性能。但是,在常规使用中,产品将会更加脆弱,在常规使用中,有可能的情况。这发生了,搜索出于差异开始。“好”和“坏”橡胶的分析通常会揭示添加剂包装中的差异,不需要的污染物或意外的化学联系。接近的实验室已经开发了一种通过迷宫引导分析师的方法图GC分析技术用于表征橡胶材料并进行故障分析。在本研究中,两项橡胶泵隔膜用于演示使用多射热解器的方法地图如何快速有效地表征橡胶材料。“好的“样品持续>在失败前1200小时,而”坏“样本持续了<800小时后,在失败前<800小时。在膜片破裂并停止到FUNCTI时,定义了FAILURE on。被问到的问题是:“这两个橡胶样品不同;两个样品的化学成分有差异吗?”回答该问题,具有气相色谱 - 质谱的热解技术,以及氮磷检测器。将使用。诸如进化的气体分析(EGA)和心脏切割(HC)分析之类的Pultiple Pyrolyzer模式将进行表征两种橡胶样品之间的差异。此外,使用热解剂作为样品的新方法然后通过多个GC检测器(MS / NPD)进行同时进行数据采集的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号