首页> 外文会议>Energy Conference and Exhibition >The Chemical Treatment to Remove Liquid Block in Hydraulic Fractured Well-A Simulation Study with Leak-Off
【24h】

The Chemical Treatment to Remove Liquid Block in Hydraulic Fractured Well-A Simulation Study with Leak-Off

机译:用泄漏 - 泄漏液压骨折液体块中的液体块的化学处理

获取原文

摘要

The chemical treatment using surfactants/solvents can mitigate the liquid block by wettibility alteration in gas/condensate wells. Recently, its application has been extended from wettibility change in matrix to wettibility alteration in propant in hydraulic fractures and tested in field trials. The leak-off of working fluids into matrix may mitigate the liquid block in the matrix adjacent fracture walls unintentionally. However, it is not clear yet whether the mitigation in matrix from leak-off is significant, compared with the mitigation in the fracture propant, and how this may affect the job design. The experimental setup and associated results was for assessment of the treatment in fracture propant only. In the lab, the leak-off will not affect the flow in fracture since hydrocarbon is injected along the fracture to simulate the production. In reality, the hydrocarbon produce passing through the matrix blocks along fracture. And all previous modeling study and job design has ignored the leak-off. This work shows by simulation of a generic case how the leak-off may affect the design and outcome of the treatment. This work clarifies several important design concerns for the chemical treatment in hydraulic fractured reservoir, which may be extended to natural fractured reservoir as well. This will affect the optimal treatment volume, prediction of outcome and economic evaluation. The leak off may bring little extra benefit from the removal of the block in matrix along fracture walls. But such extra benefit is not significant compared with that in the fracture propant. Due to leak-off, the treatment volume based on fracture volume is not adequate and the associated outcome prediction is optimistic. There is an optimal treatment distance along with fracture that had not been identified in previous study. There is not need to treat the fracture at its full length. Just the opposite, with leak off accounted for the attempt to treat the whole fracture will cost huge volume of working fluid and lead to extra liquid damage. The unintentional matrix treatment due to leak off will cost much more working fluid than the fracture treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the treatment volume during the job design.
机译:使用表面活性剂/溶剂的化学处理可以通过气体/冷凝水孔的润湿性改变来减轻液体块。最近,它的应用已经从矩阵的润湿变化延伸到液压骨折中拟人的润湿性改变并在现场试验中进行测试。工作流体进入基质的泄漏可以无意地减轻矩阵相邻的裂缝壁中的液体块。然而,尚不清楚,与裂隙备注器中的缓解相比,泄漏的缓解是否显着,以及这可能会影响工作设计。实验设置和相关结果仅用于评估骨折提法者的治疗。在实验室中,由于烃沿裂缝注入烃以模拟生产,因此泄漏不会影响裂缝中的流动。实际上,烃生产通过沿骨折通过基质块。所有以前的建模研究和工作设计都忽略了泄漏。这项工作通过模拟通用案例来泄漏可能影响治疗的设计和结果。这项工作阐明了液压破碎储层中的化学处理的几个重要设计问题,也可以扩展到天然裂缝储层。这将影响最佳的处理量,结果预测和经济评估。泄漏可能从沿骨折墙壁移除矩阵中的块中略微额外收益。但是,与骨折提法者相比,这种额外的益处并不重要。由于泄漏,基于骨折体积的处理量不足,相关的结果预测是乐观的。在先前的研究中没有尚未确定的骨折存在最佳的处理距离。不需要在整个长度下治疗骨折。恰恰相反,泄漏占试图治疗整个骨折将花费大量的工作液,导致额外的液体损坏。由于泄漏而导致的无意的基质治疗将花费比骨折处理更加有效的流体。因此,有必要在工作设计期间优化治疗量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号