首页> 外文会议>Drilling Conference and Exhibition >Alternative Drilling Fluid Weighting Agents: A Comprehensive Study on Ilmenite and Hematite
【24h】

Alternative Drilling Fluid Weighting Agents: A Comprehensive Study on Ilmenite and Hematite

机译:替代钻井液加权剂:对伊尔梅瑞特和赤铁矿进行综合研究

获取原文

摘要

For many years, barite has been the standard weighting agent in the drilling fluid industry. Its high specific gravity has helped produce mud weights in excess of 19 lb/gal. Its hardness has rendered it easily millable to a particle size that reduces settling and minimizes losses on shaker screens and its adequate inertness has enabled it to be used in a wide range of drilling fluids containing different chemical components. Recently, however, dwindling supplies and increased consumption of premium barite have led to significant price increases across the world and a reduction in specific gravity in most commercial grades. This has led to renewed interest in alternative weight materials. Ilmenite and hematite are two minerals that have been used sporadically in the field. Compared to barite, their higher density impacts both the rheology of the fluids and the settling rate of the weight material. A known issue with these materials is their relatively high hardness, which can give rise to abrasion/erosion in the tubular and surface equipment. Another effect that has not been addressed sufficiently is the magnetic characteristic of these iron oxide-containing minerals which has the potential to affect the operation of direction drilling and some other downhole tools. There have been many studies on the use of ilmenite and hematite as weight agents for drilling fluids. These have dealt with the above issues individually or in a scattered manner. In this paper, we report the results of a comprehensive laboratory study on the application of ilmenite and hematite as weight materials for both water- and oil-based drilling fluids. The study includes the effects of different size grades of the materials on rheology and fluid loss, as well as dynamic and static sag. The paper will present relative abrasiveness of the materials compared to barite as measured by two different methods, and recommend size grades that can minimize the abrasion effects. The paper will also report the results of magnetic property measurements which impact operation of several downhole tools, and compares these with that of barite and several other minerals. To complete the comparative testing of these minerals, the results of heavy metal analysis will also be reported for each test mineral.
机译:多年来,重晶石一直是钻井液工业中的标准加权剂。其高比重有助于产生超过19磅/加仑的泥浆重量。其硬度使其使其易于难以降低沉降的粒度,并最大限度地减少振荡器屏幕的损失,其充分的惰性使其能够用于含有不同化学成分的各种钻井液中。然而,最近,Dwindling Supplies和Premium Barite的增加消耗导致了世界上的大量价格增加,并且在大多数商业成绩中的比重降低。这导致对替代重量材料的重新感兴趣。钛铁矿和赤铁矿是两种矿物质,这些矿物在该领域偶尔使用。与重晶石相比,它们的较高密度会影响流体的流变学和重量材料的稳定率。这些材料的已知问题是它们相对高的硬度,这可能导致管状和表面设备中的磨损/侵蚀。尚未充分解决的另一种效果是这些含铁氧化铁的矿物质的磁特性,其具有影响方向钻孔的操作和一些其他井下工具的潜力。有很多关于使用Ilmenite和赤铁矿作为钻井液的重量试剂的研究。这些已经单独或以分散的方式处理上述问题。在本文中,我们报告了综合实验室研究的结果,钛铁矿和赤铁矿适用于水和油基钻井液的重量材料。该研究包括不同大小等级材料对流变和流体损失的影响,以及动态和静态凹陷。与通过两种不同方法测量的重晶石相比,该纸张将呈现材料的相对磨蚀性,并推荐尺寸等级,可以最小化磨损效应。本文还将报告磁性测量结果的结果,该磁性测量的影响几种井下工具的操作,并将其与重晶石和其他几种矿物质的影响进行比较。为了完成这些矿物的比较测试,还将报告每种测试矿物的重金属分析结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号