首页> 外文会议>Aerosol and Atmospheric Optics: Visibility and Air Pollution Specialty Conference >Implications of Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Methodology Differences
【24h】

Implications of Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Methodology Differences

机译:石油和天然气排放的影响库存方法论差异

获取原文

摘要

For this analysis, oil and gas EI methods were compared and evaluated for two different EISs: GNB and Gasco. The project-specific EIs were compared to the Uinta basin-wide EI. Differences were found relative to the basin-wide EI primarily for activities that generate more PM_(10) and SO_2. As regional modeling methods are refined to assess impacts from oil and gas development projects, it is recommended that the models be used in a relative mode only to assess future attainment with current air quality standards (i.e. report the cumulative concentrations), and that the project impacts only be reported using the absolute model values, recognizing that a limitation of this approach is that model bias is uncorrected.
机译:对于这种分析,对两种不同的EI方法进行了比较和评估了油气EI方法:GNB和GASCO。将项目特定的EIS与Uinta池宽的EI进行了比较。主要针对盆地EI的差异主要用于产生更多PM_(10)和SO_2的活动。随着区域建模方法的精制评估石油和天然气开发项目的影响,建议以相对模式使用的模型仅用于评估当前空气质量标准的未来达到(即报告累积浓度),以及该项目仅使用绝对模型值报告的影响,识别出这种方法的限制是模型偏差是未校正的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号