首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development >Reasonability Evaluation of Land Reclamation Using the Improved TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Four Farms in Guangxi, South China
【24h】

Reasonability Evaluation of Land Reclamation Using the Improved TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Four Farms in Guangxi, South China

机译:利用改进的TOPSIS方法合理评价土地填海方法:以华南广西四场农场为例

获取原文

摘要

Taking Guangxi agriculture and cultivation state-owned Jinguang Farm;;Qianjiang Farm. Xinxing Farm and Liangqi Farm as land reclamation cases studies, 16 evaluation indices were selected from four aspects, i.e., investment in land reclamation project, implementation intensity of land reclamation, land use structure, and efficiency output of land reclamation, to evaluate the reasonability of land reclamation in the project area. The improved TOPSIS method and obstacle degree model were used to evaluate reasonability and diagnose obstacle factors. Results showed that the efficiency output of land reclamation had the greatest impact on its reasonability, followed by land use structure, with investment of land reclamation project having the least impact. The index obstacle factors mainly referred to the improved value of land quality. Through analysis of the evaluation results, the reasonability and obstacle factors of land reclamation were objective!} determined to provide a reference for land reclamation in practice.
机译:采用广西农业和培养国有金光农场;千江农场。新兴农场和梁奇农场作为土地回收案例研究,16个评估指标选自四个方面,即土地回收项目的投资,土地填海,土地利用结构和土地回收效率产出的实施强度,评价的合理性土地填海区在项目区。改进的TopSis方法和障碍物模型用于评估合理性和诊断障碍因素。结果表明,土地回收的效率产出对其合理性的影响最大,其次是土地利用结构,具有对土地填海项目的影响最小。指数障碍因素主要提到土地质量的提高。通过分析评估结果,土地填海层的合理性和障碍因素是目标!}决定为实践中的土地回收提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号