首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production >Social Responsibility - A Comparative Study of Oil Majors - Who is the Best?
【24h】

Social Responsibility - A Comparative Study of Oil Majors - Who is the Best?

机译:社会责任 - 石油专业的比较研究 - 谁是最好的?

获取原文

摘要

Nowadays requirements of society are a priority for many organizations. Expectations of society define the elements of social responsibility which are due to change over time as a result of change in the society's concerns. As sustainable development is about the economic, social and environmental goals common to all people, it can be used as a way of summing up the broader expectations of society that need to be taken into account by organizations seeking to act responsibly. Oil &Gas activities take place in different environments (e.g. offshore, jungle, desert, arctic, etc.) and face variable challenges (e.g. sensitive areas, protected areas, isolated communities, etc.). Hence this industry deals with a set of specific risks and opportunities which could significantly impact societies, the environment and associated economic activities. Incorporating the Social Responsibility concept into business practices can play a significant role in management of major risks and opportunities. To gain an understanding of how the industry manages social responsibility aspects a sample group of major companies have been selected for this study from the top 10 of ‘‘2012 Fortune Global 500 list’’ (Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, BP, Sinopec, CNPC, Chevron and ConocoPhillips) plus Total and Repsol. The study has been undertaken based on the available information on the webpages of the companies and the latest published reports on social responsibility and/or sustainable development. These companies do not approach in a same way the incorporation of social responsibility aspects into their business, and do not even report their performance similarly but mostly consider Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guideline and ‘‘Oil and Gas Industry Voluntary Guidance on Sustainability Reporting’’ by the global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social issues (IPIECA), the American Petroleum Institute (API) and International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP) for reporting their performance. Considering the indicators of IPIECA/API/OGP and GRI guidelines it is worthwhile to develop a management system based on the Plan Do Check Act (PDCA) cycle in order to identify Social Responsibility aspects of the business, assess the risks/opportunities and define control/recovery measures. Then to continue by implementing the measures, monitoring the performance and conducting regular reviews to achieve continual improvement. A specific Social Responsibility Index developed by international bodies in the petroleum sector would help to compare these companies and develop positive competition among them. Resulting eventually in improve Social Responsibility and sustainable development performance in the industry.
机译:如今社会的要求是许多组织的优先事项。对社会的期望定义了社会责任的要素,这是由于社会担忧的变化随着时间的变化而导致的。由于可持续发展是关于所有人共同的经济,社会和环境目标,它可以作为总结所需考虑到负责任的组织所需考虑的社会更广泛的方式的一种方式。石油和天然气活动在不同的环境中进行(例如海上,丛林,沙漠,北极等)和面部变量挑战(例如,敏感区域,保护区,隔离社区等)。因此,该行业涉及一系列特定的风险和机会,可以显着影响社会,环境和相关经济活动。将社会责任概念纳入商业实践可以在对重大风险和机遇的管理中发挥重要作用。为了了解行业如何管理社会责任方面,已选中一家各大公司的一组主要公司,从“2012年财富全球500 500名单”(Royal Dutch Shell,ExxonMobil,BP,Sinopec,CNPC)中选择了这项研究,雪佛龙和康菲利普斯加上总和和repsol。该研究已经根据公司网页的可用信息和关于社会责任和/或可持续发展的最新报告。这些公司并不像将社会责任方面纳入其业务的方式相同,甚至没有同样地报告他们的表现,但主要考虑全球报告倡议(GRI)可持续性报告指南和石油和天然气行业的可持续性指引报告“全球石油和天然气行业环境与社会问题(IPIECA),美国石油研究所(API)和国际石油和天然气生产商协会(OGP),用于报告其表现。考虑到IPIECA / API / OGP和GRI指南的指标,基于该计划制定管理系统,以检查法案(PDCA)周期,以确定业务的社会责任,评估风险/机会并定义控制/恢复措施。然后继续实施措施,监测绩效并进行常规审查以实现持续改进。国际机构在石油部门开发的一个具体的社会责任指数将有助于比较这些公司并在他们之间发展积极的竞争。导致最终提高行业社会责任和可持续发展绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号