首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics >Mapping the Level of Scientific Reasoning Skills to Instructional Methodologies among Malaysian Science-Mathematics-Engineering Undergraduates
【24h】

Mapping the Level of Scientific Reasoning Skills to Instructional Methodologies among Malaysian Science-Mathematics-Engineering Undergraduates

机译:将科学推理技能水平绘制到马来西亚科学 - 数学 - 数学工程大学生中的教学方法

获取原文

摘要

The objectives of this quantitative survey research were (1) to establish the level of scientific reasoning (SR) skills among science, mathematics and engineering (SME) undergraduates in Malaysian Institute of Higher Learning (IHL); (b) to identify the types of instructional methods in teaching SME at universities; and (c) to map instructional methods employed to the level of SR skills among the undergraduates. There were six universities according to zone involved in this study using the stratification random sampling technique. For each university, the faculties that involved were faculties which have degree students in science, mathematics and engineering programme. A total of 975 students were participated in this study. There were two instruments used in this study namely, the Lawson Scientific Reasoning Skills Test and the Lecturers' Teaching Style Survey. The descriptive statistics and the inferential statistics such as mean, t-test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. Findings of the study showed that most students had concrete level of scientific reasoning skills where the overall mean was 3.23. The expert and delegator were dominant lecturers' teaching styles according to students' perception. In addition, there was no correlation between lecturers' teaching style and the level of scientific reasoning skills. Thus, this study cannot map the dominant lecturers' teaching style to the level of scientific reasoning skills of Science, Mathematics and Engineering undergraduates in Malaysian Public Institute of Higher Learning. Nevertheless, this study gave some indications that the expert and delegator teaching styles were not contributed to the development of students' scientific reasoning skills. This study can be used as a baseline for Science, Mathematics and Engineering undergraduates' level of scientific reasoning skills in Malaysian Public Institute of Higher Learning. Overall, this study also opens an endless source of other researchers to investigate more areas on scientific reasoning skills so that the potential instructional model can be developed to enhance students' level of scientific reasoning skills in Malaysian Public Institute of Higher Learning.
机译:这种定量调查研究的目标是(1),以确定马来西亚高等学校学院科学,数学和工程(中小企业)本科生科学推理(SR)技能的水平; (b)确定大学中小企业教学方法的类型; (c)将教学方法映射到本科生中的SR技能水平。使用分层随机采样技术涉及该研究的区域有六所大学。对于每个大学,所涉及的院系都是科学,数学和工程计划学生的院系。这项研究共有975名学生。本研究中有两种仪器即劳森科学推理技能测试和讲师的教学风格调查。描述性统计和平均值,T-Test和Pearson相关性等推断统计数据用于分析数据。研究结果表明,大多数学生的具体水平的科学推理技能水平,总体平均值为3.23。专家和代理人根据学生的看法是占主导地位的讲师的教学方式。此外,讲师的教学风格与科学推理技能水平之间没有相关性。因此,本研究无法将主导讲师的教学方式映射到马来西亚公共学习研究所科学,数学和工程大学生科学推理技能水平。然而,这项研究给出了一些迹象表明,专家和地区教学方式没有促进学生科学推理技能的发展。本研究可作为马来西亚公共学习研究所科学,数学和工程大学生科学推理技能水平的基线。总体而言,这项研究还开启了其他研究人员的无穷源来调查更多关于科学推理技能的领域,以便可以制定潜在的教学模式,以提高马来西亚公共研究所的学生的科学推理技能水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号