【24h】

CONTRIBUTIONS TO DESIGNING A PROFILE OF THE GENERIC OFFENDER

机译:设计普通罪犯个人资料的贡献

获取原文

摘要

Offenders are they ordinary people in unusual circumstances or have they specific characteristics that differentiate them from other "normal" people? We have tried to investigate this issue first in the psychological literature of the domain and then through a field investigation in Timisoara Penitentiary.Offending is usually considered to be a psychological fact even if he is mainly sociological. For instance neurosis is individually manifested, but it has a social reason and has to be understood as a result of this social process. When offending is described there are described groups with behaviors unaccepted by the society. Being examined offenders are found mentally disabled or retarded but this is not what makes them deviant. Not the origin of their disturbance makes the deviate but belonging to a group considered deviant. Deviance is breaking a rule, a bad integration of an individual who didn't integrate the general accepted values but also is a result of the development of social protection institutions that reject groups not conformed to "good social functioning". That's why the differences between exclusion, marginalization, ill adaptation and deviance are not very clear and each "rejected incapacity" will lead at the end to delinquency.
机译:违法者是他们在异常情况下普通人,或者他们具体特征,使他们与其他“正常”人区分开来?我们试图在域名心理文学中首先调查这个问题,然后通过Timisoara Penitentiary的实地调查。即使他主要是社会学,通常被认为是一种心理事实。例如,神经症是单独表现出来的,但它具有社会原因,并且必须被视为这一社会过程的结果。当描述违规时,描述了社会无法识别的行为的群体。被审查的罪犯被发现精神禁用或迟钝,但这并不是让他们变得偏差的原因。不是他们的骚乱的起源使得偏差但属于一个被认为是偏差的团体。偏差是违反规则,没有整合一般接受价值观的个人融合,而且还是发展社会保护机构的结果,拒绝群体不符合“良好的社会运作”。这就是为什么排除,边缘化,适应性和偏差之间的差异不是很清楚,每个“拒绝无能力”将在违法行为结束时领先。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号