首页> 外文会议>Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics >Comparison of Iterative and Direct Inversion MR Elastography Algorithms
【24h】

Comparison of Iterative and Direct Inversion MR Elastography Algorithms

机译:迭代与直接反演先生Elastography算法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) is a medical imaging modality which aims to image the mechanical properties of tissue. Tissue stiffness maps can be calculated from measurements of the steady-state mechanical response of the tissue undegoing a low frequency (40-200Hz) mechanical excitation, which are taken using modified magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. There are two classes of methods to perform this stiffness calculation: Iterative inversion, and Direct inversion. Experiments using gelatin phantoms, consisting of a soft background and stiff inclusion, show that both methods accurately locate the inclusion. Iterative inversion provides better quantitative accuracy when compared to independent measurements using a dynamic mechanical analyzer, however, the computation time is significantly longer than direct inversions (iterative methods take hours, whereas direct inversion take seconds). The decision of which method to use for a given application must be made by weighing up the advantages of fast computation time for direct inversion against the better quantitative accuracy of iterative techniques.
机译:磁共振弹性造影(MRE)是一种医学成像模式,其目的是图像组织的机械性能。组织刚度图可以根据缺少低频(40-200Hz)机械激发的组织的稳态机械响应的测量来计算,这是使用改进的磁共振成像(MRI)序列进行的。有两种方法来执行这个刚度计算:迭代反转和直接反演。使用明胶幽灵的实验,包括软背景和僵硬的包容,表明两种方法都准确地定位夹杂物。与使用动态机械分析仪的独立测量相比,迭代反转提供更好的定量精度,但是,计算时间比直接逆转更长(迭代方法需要数小时,而直接反转需要秒)。必须通过对迭代技术的更好定量准确性称量快速计算时间的优点来进行任何用于给定应用的方法的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号