首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Advanced Design and Manufacturing Engineering >Sensor Performance Analysis by Equal Strength Beam Test for Crane SHM
【24h】

Sensor Performance Analysis by Equal Strength Beam Test for Crane SHM

机译:Crane Shm等强度梁试验传感器性能分析

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this article is to select the most appropriate sensor for the crane structural health monitoring. We used three kinds of sensors to do an equal strength beam test: The original sensor R_2 and R_4 which have been calibrated, American MOI FBG sensor and wireless strain sensor. After derived the formula of maximum normal strain, we have done equal strength beam test for 3 times. Then calculated their average and contrasted their linearity to see the accuracy of MOI FBG os3110 and wireless sensor. Compared with the experimental value theoretical value, the wireless sensor has the highest accuracy, it is even more accuracy than the original sensor R_2 and R_4 which have been calibrated; Departure from linearity aspect, the wireless sensor, the original sensor R_2 and R_4,all of them have small relative error rate, it is less than 10%, but MOI FBG os3110 has very large relative error rate; In order to compare the overall performance of the sensor, we can also compare the sensors from the sensitivity aspect, zero drift, detection range, and so on.
机译:本文的目的是为起重机结构健康监测选择最合适的传感器。我们使用了三种传感器进行了相等的强度梁试验:原始的传感器R_2和R_4已被校准,美国MOI FBG传感器和无线应变传感器。在衍生出最大正常菌株的公式之后,我们已经完成了相等的强度光束测试3次。然后计算它们的平均值并对比它们的线性度,以查看MOI FBG OS3110和无线传感器的准确性。与实验值理论值相比,无线传感器具有最高的精度,比已经校准的原始传感器R_2和R_4更精确;从线性方面出发,无线传感器,原始传感器R_2和R_4,所有这些都具有小的相对差错率,它小于10%,但MOI FBG OS3110具有非常大的相对差错率;为了比较传感器的整体性能,我们还可以将传感器与灵敏度方面,零漂移,检测范围等进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号