首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Science, Automation and Material System >The Comparison of Two Methods on the Reliability of Ship Collision for Bridge Based on Applied Mechanics
【24h】

The Comparison of Two Methods on the Reliability of Ship Collision for Bridge Based on Applied Mechanics

机译:基于应用力学的桥梁架碰撞可靠性的比较

获取原文

摘要

As for the reliability of ship-bridge collision, function relation between the structure response variable and basic variable is very complex and the traditional theory has been difficult to work it out, so we need the help of finite element numerical method to obtain the solution. APDL language and two methods are used to solve the reliability of ship-bridge collision, compared to seven MCS method conditions and ODRSM-MCS probability of failure of bridge pier. The pier failure probability of 10000 MCS method sampling and ODRSM-MCS sample is very close. ODRSM-MCS method and the MCS method to the case of the same accuracy, while MCS reliability is used in the calculation, the time used is 280min and the ODRSM-MCS mix of computational time is 5min. So the ODRSM-MCS method is much more efficient and effective.
机译:至于船桥碰撞的可靠性,结构响应变量与基本变量之间的功能关系非常复杂,传统的理论难以解决,因此我们需要有限元数值方法的帮助来获得解决方案。 APDL语言和两种方法用于解决船桥碰撞的可靠性,而桥墩的七种MCS方法条件和ODRSM-MCS失效概率相比。 10000 MCS方法采样和ODRSM-MCS样本的码头故障概率非常接近。 ODRSM-MCS方法和MCS方法的案例相同的精度,而MCS可靠性用于计算中,所使用的时间是280min,ODRSM-MCS的计算时间混合为5min。因此,ODRSM-MCS方法更有效且有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号