首页> 外文会议>International Catfish Symposium >Population Trends of Flathead Catfish, Channel Catfish, and Blue Catfish in Impounded and Unimpounded Reaches of the Upper Mississippi River (1993-2007)
【24h】

Population Trends of Flathead Catfish, Channel Catfish, and Blue Catfish in Impounded and Unimpounded Reaches of the Upper Mississippi River (1993-2007)

机译:普通鲶鱼,通道鲶鱼和蓝鲶中的人口趋势在扣押和绝对地带到上层密西西比河(1993-2007)

获取原文

摘要

Using Long Term Resource Monitoring Program data collected from impounded (Pool 26) and unimpounded (Open River) reaches of the upper Mississippi River, we investigated population dynamics of flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris, channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, and blue catfish I. furcatus from random sites located in side channel border (SCB) and main channel border (MCB) habitats. Objectives were to (1) compare trends (1993-2007) of three catfishes collected in Pool 26 and Open River reaches of the upper Mississippi River, and (2) provide needed information to managers on population dynamics through time using a binary gear approach of active (i.e., daytime electrofishing) and passive gears (hoopnetting). Active gears resulted in a higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) of all catfishes in each habitat-reach combination as compared to passive gears. Passive gears resulted in negligible catches of blue catfish and flathead catfishes (e.g., mean of <1 fish/net night). Catch per unit effort usingactive gear resulted in a greater number of channel catfish captured in Pool 26 compared to the Open River, with Open River SCB habitat having the lowest CPUE in most years. Blue catfish in the Open River had a higher CPUE using active gear as compared to Pool 26, with the Open River MCB having the greatest CPUE. Flathead catfish had a higher CPUE in MCB habitat compared to SCB habitat, with the Open River MCB having the highest CPUE in most years. However, declining trends in flathead catfish appears to be occurring in Open River habitats while trends in flathead catfish appear to be slightly increasing in Pool 26. The most common length-classes captured were substock and stock-sized fish regardless of habitat, species, or reach. Trends for channel catfish were easily determined due to high catch rates; however, more monitoring and enhanced sampling is needed to accurately assess flathead catfish and blue catfish trends and to accurately determine demographics for all three species.
机译:使用从被扣押(泳池26)和未吸引(开放河)的长期资源监测计划数据,我们对上密西西比河的悬而未决的人,我们调查了Plathead鲶鱼Pylodictis Olivaris,通道鲶鱼Intalurus punctatus的人口动态,以及从随机的蓝鲶鱼I. furcatus位于侧通道边界(SCB)和主通道边框(MCB)栖息地的网站。目标是(1)比较舞台26收集的三个鲶鱼(1993-2007)在泳池26和上部密西西比河的河流到达的趋势(1993-2007),(2)通过使用二进制齿轮方法向管理人员提供所需信息主动(即日间电钻)和无源齿轮(圈网)。与被动齿轮相比,主动齿轮导致每个栖息地组合中所有栖息地组合的所有单位努力(CPUE)。被动齿轮导致捕获的蓝鲶鱼和扁平鱼捕鱼(例如,<1鱼/净夜间的平均值)。捕获每单位努力用活性齿轮导致池26中捕获的沟通鲶鱼相比,与开放河相比,开放的河流SCB栖息地在大多数年内拥有最低的CPUE。与泳池26相比,开放河中的蓝鲶有一个更高的CPUE,与池26相比,开放的河流MCB拥有最大的CPUE。 Flathead Catfish在MCB栖息地的CPUE中有一个更高的CPUE,与SCB栖息地相比,开放的河流MCB在大多数情况下拥有最高的CPUE。然而,普罗拉德鲶鱼的趋势似乎发生在开放的河流栖息地,而普罗兰鲶鱼的趋势似乎在游泳池26似乎略有增加。捕获的最常见的长度课程是肉类和股票大小的鱼类,无论栖息地,物种或抵达。由于高速率率,容易确定频道鲶鱼的趋势;然而,需要更多的监测和增强的采样来准确地评估扁平鲶鱼和蓝鲶趋势,并准确地确定所有三种物种的人口统计学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号