首页> 外文会议>Symposium on sediment dynamics for a changing future >Comparative analysis of two distributed soil erosion and sediment yield models in Sichuan Basin, China
【24h】

Comparative analysis of two distributed soil erosion and sediment yield models in Sichuan Basin, China

机译:四川盆地两种分布式土壤侵蚀与沉积物的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Based on data from two watershed outlets, and three runoff plots in the purple soil hilly areas of Sichuan Basin, two distributed soil erosion and sediment yield models were constructed. One is based on a grid with 20-m resolution in Hemingguan Watershed, with an area of 0.419 km~2, and the other is based on a land plot in Lizikou Watershed with an area of 19.63 km~2. Comparison of these two models shows that the simulation based on the high precision grid is more accurate. When the area of a watershed is larger than 10 km~2, the accuracy of the model will be increased if a high-resolution grid is adopted, whereas if the resolution of the grid is low, the grid will generalize too much information, such as different land-use patterns in the same grid. On the other hand, a distributed model based on a land plot can substantially reduce the computational complexity because the land-use means are uniform. The two models basically have the same structure, but the Hemingguan model is more accurate than the Lizikou model.
机译:基于两个流域网点,并在紫色土3个径流小区丘陵四川盆地地区,两个分布式土壤侵蚀产沙模型构建的数据。一种是基于在鹤鸣流域20μm的分辨率,具有0.419公里〜2的区域中的网格,并且另一个是基于一个地块中Lizikou流域与19.63公里〜2的面积。这两款车型的对比表明,基于高精度电网仿真更加准确。当分水岭的面积大于10km〜2时,如果高分辨率网格采用的模型的准确度将增加,而如果网格的分辨率低时,网格将概括太多的信息,例如在同一电网不同土地利用方式。在另一方面,根据地块的分布式模型可以大大降低计算复杂性,因为土地使用的手段是统一的。这两种型号基本上具有相同的结构,但鹤鸣模型比Lizikou模型更加准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号