首页> 外文会议>International RILEM Symposium on Self-Compacting Concrete >Similarities and Differences of Pumping Conventional and Self-Compacting Concrete
【24h】

Similarities and Differences of Pumping Conventional and Self-Compacting Concrete

机译:泵送常规和自压式混凝土的相似之处和差异

获取原文

摘要

In practice, self-compacting concrete (SCC) is considered as a simple extension of conventional vibrated concrete (CVC) when pumping is concerned. The same equipment, materials, pumping procedures and guidelines used for CVC are applied when pumping SCC. On the other hand, it has been clearly shown that the rheological properties and the mix design of SCC are different than CVC. Can the same pumping principles employed for CVC be applied for SCC? This paper compares the some published results of pumping of CVC with those for SCC. A first striking difference between pumping of CVC and SCC is the flow behaviour in the pipes. The flow of CVC is a plug, surrounded by a lubricating layer, while during the flow of SCC, part of the concrete volume itself is sheared inside the pipe. As a result, the importance of viscosity increases in case of SCC. Due to the low yield stress of SCC, the behaviour in bends is different, but quite complex to study. Due to the lower content of aggregate and better stability of SCC, as it is less prone to internal water migration, blocking is estimated to occur at lower frequency in case of SCC.
机译:在实践中,当泵送施加时,自压力混凝土(SCC)被认为是传统振动混凝土(CVC)的简单延伸。泵送SCC时应用了用于CVC的相同设备,材料,泵送程序和指南。另一方面,已经清楚地表明,流变性和SCC的混合设计与CVC不同。可以应用于CVC的相同泵浦原理适用于SCC?本文比较了与SCC泵送CVC的一些公开结果。 CVC和SCC的泵送之间的第一个引人注目的差异是管道中的流动行为。 CVC的流动是由润滑层包围的塞子,而在SCC的流动期间,混凝土体积本身的一部分在管道内剪切。结果,在SCC的情况下粘度增加的重要性。由于SCC的低屈服应力,弯曲中的行为是不同的,但学习的行为相当复杂。由于聚集体含量较低,并且SCC的更好稳定性,因为它不太容易容易出现内部水迁移,估计在SCC的情况下以较低频率发生阻塞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号