【24h】

Herding the cats

机译:放牧猫

获取原文

摘要

Peer production systems rely on users to self-select appropriate tasks and "scratch their personal itch". However, many such systems require significant maintenance work, which also implies the need for collective action, that is, individuals following goals set by the group and performing good citizenship behaviors. How can this paradox be resolved? Here we examine one potential answer: the influence of social identification with the larger group on contributors' behavior. We examine Wikipedia, a highly successful peer production system, and find a significant and growing influence of group structure, with a prevalent example being the WikiProject. Comparison of editors who join projects with those who do not and comparisons of the joiners' behavior before and after they join a project suggest their identification with the group plays an important role in directing them towards group goals and good citizenship behaviors. Upon joining, Wikipedians are more likely to work on project-related content, to shift their contributions towards coordination rather than production work, and to perform maintenance work such as reverting vandalism. These results suggest that group influence can play an important role in maintaining the health of online communities, even when such communities are putatively self-directed peer production systems.
机译:对等生产系统依靠用户自我选择适当的任务和“划伤他们的个人痒”。然而,许多这样的系统需要大量的维护工作,这也意味着需要集体行动,即个人按照本集团设定的目标并执行良好的公民身份行为。这个悖论如何解决?在这里,我们研究了一个潜在的答案:社会认同对贡献者行为的较大群体的影响。我们检查维基百科,一个高度成功的同行生产系统,并找到了组结构的显着且不断增长的影响,具有普遍的例子是Wikiproject。与他们加入项目之前和之后的那些与那些没有和比较的人加入项目的编辑的比较表明他们对集团的身份证明在将他们指向集团目标和良好的公民身份方面发挥着重要作用。加入后,维基菲人更有可能在项目相关内容上工作,以改变他们对协调而不是生产工作的贡献,并进行维护工作,如恢复故意破坏。这些结果表明,即使这些社区是借助自我指导的同行生产系统,群体影响力也可以在维持在线社区的健康方面发挥重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号