首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Engineering >Influence of Parameter Identification of Anisotropic Yield Function on Spring-Back Prediction in Finite Element Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Process
【24h】

Influence of Parameter Identification of Anisotropic Yield Function on Spring-Back Prediction in Finite Element Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Process

机译:各向异性产量函数参数识别对金属板成型工艺有限元模拟中的回弹预测的影响

获取原文

摘要

The anisotropic plastic behavior of metallic sheet has a significant influence on spring-back, and is usually modeled by anisotropic yield function in numerical simulation. Material parameters of anisotropic yield function are generally identified either by yield stresses or by r-values, or both of them. For Hill1948 and Yld89 anisotropic yield functions, r-values are still widely used to calibrate their material parameters in spring-back prediction. Here, yield stresses and r-values were respectively used to calibrate them, and the differences of the spring-back simulated by these two identification methods were discussed. To evaluate their accuracy, the simulation results were compared with the spring-back calculated by Yld2000-2d anisotropic yield function. The result shows that when yield stresses were used to identify the material parameters of Hill 1948 and Yld89 yield functions, the simulated spring-back was closer to that of Yld2000-2d yield function.
机译:金属片的各向异性塑料行为对弹簧背部具有显着影响,并且通常通过数值模拟中的各向异性产量函数建模。各向异性屈服函数的材料参数通常通过屈服应力或通过R值或它们两者鉴定。对于Hill1948和YLD89各向异性产量函数,R值仍然被广泛用于在弹簧背预测中校准它们的材料参数。这里,讨论了屈服应力和R值来校准它们,并讨论了通过这两个识别方法模拟的弹簧背的差异。为了评估其准确性,将模拟结果与由YLD2000-2D各向异性屈服函数计算的弹簧回进行比较。结果表明,当使用屈服应力来识别Hill 1948和YLD89产量函数的材料参数时,模拟的弹簧返回更接近YLD2000-2D产量功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号