首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management and Service Science >Does Porter hypothesis exist? - take Major-surveyed Industries in Jiangxi Province as an example
【24h】

Does Porter hypothesis exist? - take Major-surveyed Industries in Jiangxi Province as an example

机译:波特假设是否存在? - 以江西省的主要调查产业为例

获取原文

摘要

With 2001-2008 panel data of major-surveyed industries in Jiangxi, we do the empirical test on industrial competitiveness, innovation capacity and environment protection capability of environmental policy regulation, to test Porter hypothesis. We find Pollution tax policy has the best performance, emission abatement investment policy be the second. While the "three simultaneous" implementation policy, administrative punishment policy and the policy of public partition do not play their roles because of the execution and coverage. Among them, the pollution emission tax policy elasticity on technology innovation and profit-cost ratio are 0.97 and 0.007; the elasticity on wastewater, waste gas, S02 emission intensity are -1.47, -1.21, -1.37 respectively. All the conclusion is agree to Porter Hypothesis, so it is helpful to implement environment policy under low-carbon economy.
机译:江西主要受访行业2001 - 2008年小组数据,我们对工业竞争力,创新能力和环境保护能力进行了实证检验,对环境政策监管进行了测试,以测试波特假设。我们发现污染税收政策具有最佳表现,排放减排投资政策是第二。虽然“三个同时”实施政策,行政处罚政策和公共分区政策不起作用,因为执行和覆盖。其中,技术创新和盈利成本比的污染排放税收政策弹性为0.97和0.007;废水中的弹性,废气,S02发射强度分别为-1.47,-1.21,-1.37。所有结论都同意波特假设,因此在低碳经济下实施环境政策有助于。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号