【24h】

Comparison of 3S multi-thresolding with fuzzy C-means method

机译:用模糊C-均值法比较3S多绞合法

获取原文

摘要

The 3S (Shrinking-Search-Space) multi-thresholding method which have been used for segmentation of medical images according to their intensities, now have been implemented and compared with FCM method in terms of segmentation quality and segmentation time as a benchmark in thresholding. The results show that 3S method produced almost the same segmentation quality or in some occasions better quality than FCM, and the computation time of 3S method is much lower than FCM. This is another superiority of this method with respect to others. Also, the performance of C-means has been compared with two other methods. This comparison shows that, C-means is not a reliable clustering algorithm and it needs several run to give us a reliable result.
机译:现在已经过强度用于根据其强度用于分割医学图像的3S(缩小搜索空间)多阈值处理方法,并将其与FCM方法在分割质量和分段时间中作为阈值的基准测试。结果表明,3S方法几乎相同的分割质量或在某种程度上产生的质量比FCM更好,3S方法的计算时间远低于FCM。这是该方法关于他人的另一种优越性。此外,与另外两种方法进行了比较C-Meance的性能。此比较表明,C-Meance不是可靠的聚类算法,它需要多个运行,为我们提供可靠的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号