首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Quantum Interaction >Type Indeterminacy in Privacy Decisions: The Privacy Paradox Revisited
【24h】

Type Indeterminacy in Privacy Decisions: The Privacy Paradox Revisited

机译:在隐私决策中键入不确定性:隐私悖论重新审视

获取原文

摘要

The paper at hand aims to provide a rational explanation of why people generously give away personal data while at the same time being highly concerned about their privacy. For many years, research has come up with attempts to untangle the privacy paradox. We provide a thorough literature review on privacy decisions in socio-economic scenarios and identify explanatory gaps. To explain paradoxical behavior in privacy decision making we illuminate (1) generous data disclosure and (2) high valuation of privacy as two non-commuting observations of incompatible preferences (types). Abstract risk awareness of privacy threats and concrete privacy decisions are not interchangeable, i.e. disclosing personal data prior to becoming aware of privacy risks does not equal the raising of risk awareness before revealing personal information. Privacy decisions do not commute as subjects may alter their preferences indeterminately, i.e. at the time an actual decision is made, in response to discomfort arising from conflicting preferences.
机译:手中的纸张旨在为为什么人们慷慨地赠送个人数据的原因解释,同时对他们的隐私感到高度关注。多年来,研究提出了未遂隐私悖论的尝试。我们对社会经济情景中的隐私决策提供了彻底的文献综述,并确定了解释性差距。为了解释隐私决策中的矛盾行为,我们阐明(1)慷慨的数据披露和(2)高估隐私,作为对不兼容的偏好(类型)的两个非通勤观察。摘要风险对隐私威胁和具体隐私决策的风险意识并不互换,即在意识到隐私风险之前披露个人数据并不等于在揭示个人信息之前提高风险意识。隐私决定不公平,因为受试者可以确定改变他们的偏好,即在实际决定时,响应于偏离偏好产生的不适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号