【24h】

What is the Future of Wildlife Rabies Control in Europe?

机译:欧洲野生动物狂犬病控制的未来是什么?

获取原文

摘要

Over the last fifteen years or so, classical rabies in terrestrial wildlife has been eliminated from large areas of Western Europe. Over the next few years, terrestrial rabies is likely to occur only east of a line from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea; the overall aim is to eliminate terrestrial rabies from the whole European Union. Elimination of rabies from the less rich countries of Eastern Europe, and the protection of Europe against a resurgence of rabies in the longer term requires modifications to existing OIE and WHO strategies. Here we discuss the options available tp eliminate rabies in wildlife while taking account of financial cost, and how to maintain a 'cordon sanitaire' along the eastern boundary of the EU in order to protect the rabies-free areas from rabies incursion. Minimising financial costs at the national level is obviously essential, considering the competing priorities for development and health. This could be achieved either by increasing external funding (for example by the EU) and/or by changing the currently agreed vaccination strategy to reduce costs; any such change must not substantially reduce the chances of rabies elimination. A cordon sanitaire might be placed outside the economic area of the EU, to protect the whole of the EU, or it might be placed within the easternmost countries to ensure logistical consistency of vaccination. Policy must also anticipate an emergency due to rabies breaking out in a previously freed region. Strategic planning may be complicatedby the increasing range and abundance of the raccoon dog, an introduced species that is increasingly important as a host for fox rabies. It is argued here that models help to evaluate alternative strategies, exploring options for optimising costs by minimising bait density and frequency or by reducing the vaccination area.
机译:在过去的十五年左右,陆地野生动物的古典狂犬病已被从西欧的大面积消除。在接下来的几年里,陆地狂犬病才能从波罗的海到黑海的一条线上发生;整体目标是消除全欧盟的陆地狂犬病。消除来自欧洲的较少国家的狂犬病,以及在长期内对狂犬病的重新提高的保护需要修改现有的OIE和谁的战略。在这里,我们在考虑到财务成本的同时,我们讨论可用的选项TP在野生动物中消除狂犬病,以及如何在欧盟东部边界维护“CORTON Sanitaire”,以保护来自狂犬病侵犯的无狂犬区。考虑到发展和健康的竞争优先事项,最小化国家层面的财务成本明显是必不可少的。这可以通过增加外部资金(例如由欧盟)和/或通过改变目前商定的疫苗接种策略来降低成本;任何这样的变化都不能显着减少狂犬病消除的机会。 Citon Sanitaire可能被放置在欧盟的经济区之外,以保护整个欧盟,或者可能被置于最东部的国家,以确保疫苗接种的后勤一致性。政策还必须预测由于狂犬病在先前释放的地区爆发的紧急情况。战略规划可能是复杂的浣熊的范围和丰富,这是一种越来越重要的物种,作为狐狸狂犬病的主持人越来越重要。在此辩称,模型有助于评估替代策略,通过最小化诱饵密度和频率或减少疫苗接种区域来探索优化成本的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号