【24h】

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS TO BALANCE ECOSYSTEM AND SECURITY GOALS

机译:平衡生态系统和安全目标的概念框架

获取原文

摘要

Emerging European legislation is changing the scope of water management from the local scale to basin scale. The focus is shifting from sectoral, issue-by-issue management to the protection of aquatic ecosystems, as well as the terrestrial ecosystems and wetlands linked to them. There has also been a movement from addressing problems in isolation on land, in freshwaters, in estuaries or the coastal zone, to integrating these zones, and extending the ecosystem approach to whole shelf areas. Ecosystem protection will thus affect how many human activities are regulated and managed in coastal and port areas, but legislation is also designed to balance these ecosystem objectives with socioeconomic needs and goals. Sustainable protection of ecosystems requires an expansion of traditional ecological risk assessment methods, in order to address multiple risk drivers on multiple spatial and temporal scales. If one accepts the Belluck et al. definition of environmental security, which: involves actions that guard against environmental degradation in order to preserve or protect human, material, and natural resources at scales ranging from global to local… then the goals of this legislation can be defined as environmental security. However, the current climate of anxiety about terrorism and extreme events often results in a situation where rare but dramatic events (such as terrorist attacks and extreme storms) are not addressed in the same frameworks as the more mundane issues such as contaminant control and habitat degradation. There is a need to develop decision frameworks in which these seemingly disparate issues are addressed together in support of regional budgeting, decision making, and management. To that end, vulnerabilities must be identified and ranked, and decisions must be developed based upon a number of issues including scenario probability, preventability, causality (human-caused or natural), time scale (gradual or sudden), and potential costs and risks. Depending on these assessments, prevention strategies and response strategies (whether a scenario is unpreventable or if prevention fails) must be developed.
机译:新兴欧洲立法正在从当地规模到盆地的水管理范围。重点是从部门,逐个问题的管理到保护水生生态系统,以及与他们联系的地面生态系统和湿地。在整合这些区域,以及将这些区域的孤立,新鲜水域,河口或沿海地区的野外区,河口,河口或沿海地区,以及将生态系统方法延伸到整个货架区域的地区,还有一项运动。因此,生态系统保护将影响沿海和港口地区监管和管理的人类活动,但立法还旨在平衡这些生态系统的目标,以社会经济需求和目标平衡。对生态系统的可持续保护需要扩大传统的生态风险评估方法,以解决多个空间和时间尺度上的多个风险驱动因素。如果一个人接受Belluck等。环境安全的定义,涉及防止环境退化的行动,以保护或保护从全球到当地的尺度的人,材料和自然资源......那么该立法的目标可以被定义为环境安全。然而,目前对恐怖主义和极端事件的焦虑气候通常会导致罕见但恐怖袭击和极端风暴的恐怖事件(如恐怖主义攻击和极端风暴)在与污染物控制和栖息地退化等更平凡的问题中没有解决的情况。有必要制定决策框架,其中这些看似不同的问题在一起,以支持区域预算,决策和管理。为此,必须识别和排序漏洞,并且必须基于许多问题,包括场景概率,预防性,因果关系(人造或自然),时间尺度(逐渐或突然)以及潜在成本和风险的问题来开发决定。根据这些评估,预防策略和反应策略(是否必须制定方案是不可辩护的或者如果预防失败)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号