首页> 外文会议>Central States Section of the Combustion Institute Technical Meeting >Assessment of Emissions Prediction Capability of RANS based PDF models for Lean Premixed Combustion of Methane
【24h】

Assessment of Emissions Prediction Capability of RANS based PDF models for Lean Premixed Combustion of Methane

机译:基于RAN的稀释预混燃烧的RAN的排放预测能力评估

获取原文

摘要

The high computational cost of Large Eddy Simulation (LES) makes Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods the current standard for turbulent combustion modeling. Empirical models for turbulence, turbulence-combustion interaction and chemical kinetics are, however, a major source of uncertainty in RANS based combustion simulation. While Probability Density Function (PDF) based models overcome some of these issues, most commercial codes do not take full advantage of these models. In this study, lean premixed combustion of methane in a bluff-body combustor is simulated using two different reduced chemical mechanisms (ARM9 and ARM19) combined with the composition PDF transport combustion model in the commercial code FLUENT. Two different turbulence models, namely the RNG k-ε model and the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) are used and the results of the simulations are compared to experimental data. For all the models tested, the prediction of temperature and major species (CH{sub}4, O{sub}2, CO{sub}2, CO, H{sub}2, and H{sub}2O) was good when compared to experiments. While all of the model predictions for the intermediate species OH showed an order magnitude difference (compared to the experiments) close to the bluff body surface; downstream axial locations showed good quantitative and qualitative agreement with the experiments. In a trend similar to the previous study (Nanduri et al., 2007) using the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) model, predicted values for NO emission radial profiles showed an average difference of ±5 ppm when compared to experimental values. The results were also compared to the results of a velocity-composition joint PDF model developed by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh. In terms of emissions (NO and CO) predictions the relatively expensive composition PDF model in FLUENT did not give significant improvement when compared to the computationally cheaper EDC models. However, the velocity-composition joint PFD model used by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh did show significant improvement over EDC models in the prediction of NO. Both of the PDF models resulted in better qualitative and quantitative agreement in H{sub}2 prediction, thus showing the promise of PDF based models in simulating lean premixed combustion of fuel blends like hydrogen enriched natural gas.
机译:大型涡仿真(LES)的高计算成本使雷诺斯平均南北斯托克斯(RANS)方法是湍流燃烧建模的当前标准。然而,湍流,湍流 - 燃烧相互作用和化学动力学的经验模型是基于RAN的燃烧模拟中的不确定性的主要来源。虽然基于概率密度函数(PDF)的模型克服了一些这些问题,但大多数商业代码都不充分利用这些模型。在该研究中,使用两种不同的化学机制(ARM9和ARM19)模拟凹槽 - 体燃烧器中的甲烷的瘦预混燃烧,所述化学机制(ARM9和ARM19)与商业代码流畅的组合物PDF传输燃烧模型。使用两种不同的湍流模型,即使用RNG K-ε模型和雷诺应力模型(RSM),并将模拟结果与实验数据进行比较。对于所有测试的模型,温度和主要物种的预测(CH {sub} 4,o {sub} 2,co {sub} 2,co,h {sub} 2和h {sub} 2o)是好的与实验相比。虽然中间物质的所有模型预测OH显示了靠近虚张声体表面的顺序幅度差(与实验相比);下游轴向位置与实验显示出良好的定量和定性协议。在类似于以前的研究(Nanduri等,2007)使用涡流耗散概念(EDC)模型的趋势中,与实验值相比,没有发射径向谱的预测值显示出±5ppm的平均差。结果也将结果与匹兹堡大学研究人员开发的速度组成联合PDF模型的结果进行了比较。在排放(NO和CO)预测方面,与计算更便宜的EDC模型相比,流利的相对昂贵的组成PDF模型不会显着改善。然而,匹兹堡大学的研究人员使用的速度组成联合PFD模型确实在预测中显示了EDC模型的显着改善。 PDF模型的两个PDF模型在H {Sub} 2预测中导致了更好的定性和定量协议,从而显示了基于PDF基础模型的承诺,用于模拟燃料混合等燃料混合等富氢的天然气的燃烧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号