【24h】

ROLE OF THE TSO IN PUBLIC INFORMATION/ DEBATE OPENNESS, TRANSPARENCY

机译:TSO在公共信息/辩论开放,透明度的作用

获取原文

摘要

Licensing of a nuclear facility in Finland involves three phases: the Government resolution, construction licence and operating licence phases. Implementation of the resolution requires Parliamentary approval. At each step, Finland's regulatory body, the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), is requested to give its opinion on the acceptability of the nuclear facility from a nuclear safety point of view. In making its evaluation, the regulator needs assistance from its technical and scientific support organizations (TSOs). In such a role, it is not the duty of the TSO to participate in public debate regarding the safety of the nuclear reactor concept. Likewise, if the TSO supports the power company or the plant vendor in the licensing process, it should not have an active public role. The TSO should only 'tell the facts' if asked by the customer. Often, the TSOs are publicly owned, and in small countries with limited resources, the same TSO may need to work for both sectors. In such a case, the need to maintain independence and impartiality in a plausible way is indeed challenging and the role in public debate is restricted. There are, however, other opportunities where the TSO could gain credibility as an impartial source of information. For example, if the TSO is an institute that conducts research in various energy sectors and is well established at least nationally, its views are noticed. It could publish background information for the layperson, where different phenomena, opportunities, threats and future views are presented in a balanced manner. The views should be balanced in the sense that they should not be interpreted as advocating nuclear energy as the only solution. In order to demonstrate transparency, the organization should be able to show how possible conflicts of interest are resolved. This paper discusses these opportunities based mainly on the experience of cooperation between the Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) and STUK.
机译:芬兰核设施的许可涉及三个阶段:政府决议,建设许可和运营许可阶段。该决议的实施要求议会批准。在每一步,要求芬兰的监管机构,辐射和核安全管理局(Stuk),旨在提出核心核安全性的可接受性的意见。在评估方面,监管机构需要援助其技术和科学支持组织(TSOS)。在这种作用中,TSO的责任不是关于核反应堆概念的安全的公开辩论。同样,如果TSO支持电力公司或工厂供应商在许可过程中,它不应该有积极的公共角色。如果客户要求,TSO只应该“告诉事实”。通常,TSO是公开拥有的,在资源有限的小国,同样的TSO可能需要为这两个部门工作。在这种情况下,以合理的方式保持独立性和公正性的必要性确实有挑战性,公开辩论中的作用受到限制。然而,TSO可以获得可信度作为公正信息来源的其他机会。例如,如果TSO是一个在各种能源领域进行研究的研究所,并且至少在全国性地建立的情况下,就会发现其观点。它可以发布Layperson的背景信息,其中不同现象,机会,威胁和未来视图以平衡的方式提出。意义上的意义应该是平衡的,因为它们不应被解释为倡导核能作为唯一的解决方案。为了展示透明度,本组织应该能够展示有可能解决利益冲突。本文讨论了这些机会,主要是芬兰(VTT)和Stuk技术研究中心合作经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号