【24h】

ROLE OF THE TSO IN PUBLIC INFORMATION/ DEBATE OPENNESS, TRANSPARENCY

机译:TSO在公共信息/辩论公开,透明度中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Licensing of a nuclear facility in Finland involves three phases: the Government resolution, construction licence and operating licence phases. Implementation of the resolution requires Parliamentary approval. At each step, Finland's regulatory body, the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), is requested to give its opinion on the acceptability of the nuclear facility from a nuclear safety point of view. In making its evaluation, the regulator needs assistance from its technical and scientific support organizations (TSOs). In such a role, it is not the duty of the TSO to participate in public debate regarding the safety of the nuclear reactor concept. Likewise, if the TSO supports the power company or the plant vendor in the licensing process, it should not have an active public role. The TSO should only 'tell the facts' if asked by the customer. Often, the TSOs are publicly owned, and in small countries with limited resources, the same TSO may need to work for both sectors. In such a case, the need to maintain independence and impartiality in a plausible way is indeed challenging and the role in public debate is restricted. There are, however, other opportunities where the TSO could gain credibility as an impartial source of information. For example, if the TSO is an institute that conducts research in various energy sectors and is well established at least nationally, its views are noticed. It could publish background information for the layperson, where different phenomena, opportunities, threats and future views are presented in a balanced manner. The views should be balanced in the sense that they should not be interpreted as advocating nuclear energy as the only solution. In order to demonstrate transparency, the organization should be able to show how possible conflicts of interest are resolved. This paper discusses these opportunities based mainly on the experience of cooperation between the Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) and STUK.
机译:芬兰核设施的许可包括三个阶段:政府决议,建筑许可和运营许可阶段。该决议的执行需要得到议会的批准。在每一步骤中,都要求芬兰监管机构辐射与核安全局(STUK)从核安全的角度对核设施的可接受性发表意见。在进行评估时,监管机构需要其技术和科学支持组织(TSO)的协助。在这种作用下,TSO没有义务参加有关核反应堆概念安全性的公开辩论。同样,如果TSO在许可过程中支持电力公司或电厂供应商,则它不应扮演积极的公共角色。 TSO仅应客户要求“说明事实”。通常,TSO是公共拥有的,在资源有限的小国中,同一TSO可能需要在两个部门都工作。在这种情况下,以合理的方式维持独立性和公正性的需求确实具有挑战性,并且在公共辩论中的作用受到限制。但是,TSO还有其他机会可以作为公正的信息来源获得信誉。例如,如果TSO是一家从事各种能源领域研究的机构,并且至少在全国范围内已建立良好的机构,那么它的观点就会受到关注。它可以为外行发布背景信息,以平衡的方式呈现不同的现象,机会,威胁和未来观点。在不应将它们解释为主张核能为唯一解决方案的意义上,应平衡观点。为了证明透明度,组织应该能够说明如何解决可能的利益冲突。本文主要根据芬兰技术研究中心(VTT)和STUK之间的合作经验来讨论这些机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号