首页> 外文会议>International Technology,Education and Development Conference >OLDER PEOPLE'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE INTERNET: COMPARISONS AMONG USERS AND NON-USERS
【24h】

OLDER PEOPLE'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE INTERNET: COMPARISONS AMONG USERS AND NON-USERS

机译:老年人对互联网的态度:用户和非用户之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

Despite the potential benefits that new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) could provide for older people, it is in this particular age group where large numbers of non-users can be found. Although older people's use of the Internet, which is the focus of this study, has steadily increased in recent years, the use is still less frequent compared to younger generations. An agerelated digital divide has therefore been suggested. The majority of research into technology acceptance models that attempt to explain why individuals adopt or choose not to adopt technologies has been conducted in occupational contexts or educational settings where, for example, new technologies were introduced. Thus, the present study addressed the somewhat under-researched population of older participants in research into new technologies. The aim of the current study was to investigate factors that could describe and explain use and non-use of several Internet functions, such as searching for information and using e-mail, among older individuals. Questionnaires that included separate sections for users and non-users were distributed to people aged 65 and over. Based on user acceptance models, the questionnaires also included variables that were specifically significant for older generations and incorporated further socio-cultural aspects. Responses of N = 212 participants were analysed. The present study could confirm the importance of factors suggested in the technology acceptance literature, more specifically, relevant factors for non-users included the perceived usefulness of the specific Internet function and the perceived ease of use in relation to this function. Social influence also represented a critical variable. Factors that describe the Internet use among users could be more globally categorized into negative and positive attitudes towards, and aspects of, the Internet function under investigation. Furthermore, although access has often been considered as the main factor responsible for an age-related digital divide, results of the present study suggest that this seems to be only partly true. The results suggest that there is in fact a clear divide among older people but that access plays a less prominent role for these intra-group differences. Instead, motivational aspects to learn the technologies are emphasized. People's views on life-long learning and how they evaluate the impact of these technologies on society, aspects that were also investigated in this study, have to be considered as well. The research extends work on user acceptance models by applying such models to older generations. The inclusion of age-specific and further motivational and socio-cultural aspects allows to more fully account for older people's use or non-use of new technologies. It is crucial to address these additional factors as they not only provide a better understanding of why people opt for or against these technologies but also as this understanding will ultimately help to design appropriate interventions.
机译:尽管新信息和通信技术(ICT)可以为老年人提供潜在的好处,但它位于这个特殊年龄组中,可以找到大量非用户。虽然老年人近年来稳步增加了互联网的互联网,但与年轻世代相比,使用仍然不那么频繁。因此提出了一个剧情的数字鸿沟。大多数研究进入技术验收模型,试图解释为什么个人采用或选择不采用技术在职业范围或教育环境中进行,例如,介绍了新技术。因此,本研究涉及研究新技术的旧人较老年人患者的稍微缺点。当前研究的目的是调查,可以描述和解释使用和非使用的几家互联网功能,如搜索信息,并使用电子邮件,老年个体间的因素。包括用户和非用户的单独部分的问卷分配给65岁及以上的人。根据用户验收模型,问卷也包括对旧世代特别重要的变量,并纳入了进一步的社会文化方面。分析了n = 212名参与者的回应。本研究可以确认在技术验收文献中提出的因素的重要性,更具体地,非用户的相关因素包括特定互联网函数的感知有用性以及与此功能相关的易用性。社会影响也代表了一个关键变量。描述用户之间的互联网使用的因素可以更全球范围内的互联网职能的负面和积极的态度和方面。此外,虽然访问经常被认为是负责年龄相关的数字鸿沟的主要因素,但目前研究的结果表明,这似乎只是部分是真实的。结果表明,老年人实际上存在明确的划分,但访问对这些组内差异起着不太突出的作用。相反,强调了解技术的动机方面。人们对生命学习的看法以及如何评估这些技术对社会的影响,也必须考虑在本研究中调查的各个方面。该研究通过将这些模型应用于旧世代的模型来扩展了用户验收模型的工作。包含年龄特异性和进一步的励志和社会文化方面允许更全面地占老年人使用或不使用新技术。对于解决这些额外的因素至关重要,因为它们不仅可以更好地理解为什么人们选择或反对这些技术,而且因为这种理解最终有助于设计适当的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号