首页> 外文会议>American Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting >Economical Study of Bioparticles used for Denitrification in Fluidized Bed Bioreactors (FBBR)
【24h】

Economical Study of Bioparticles used for Denitrification in Fluidized Bed Bioreactors (FBBR)

机译:流化床生物反应器中用于脱氮的生物颗粒的经济学研究(FBBR)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Economical study of different bioparticles for four Denitrifying Fluidized Bed Bioreactors (DFBBRs) using granulated maxi-blast plastic, granulated multi-blast plastic, natural zeolite, and lava rock were investigated to evaluate the feasibility of employing these media as carrier media or “bioparticles” for denitrification in a fluidized bed bioreactors. The work showed that the multi-blast plastic and natural zeolite achieved nitrogen and organic removal efficiencies of 99% and 87%, respectively whereas, the maxi-blast plastic and lava rock achieved removals efficiencies of 94% and 77%, respectively. Low biomass yields were observed for multi-blast plastic and natural zeolite of 0.12g VSS/g COD, while the yield for both the maxi-blast plastic and lava rock was 0.19 g VSS/g COD. Comprehensive economic evaluation of the fluidization energy consumption of each media considering the initial capital cost, operating and running cost, and replacement cost showed that the multi-blast plastic and maxi-blast plastic media were cheaper than natural zeolite and lava rock. Considering the average sphericity of each media, the particles with average sphericity of 0.9 i.e. multi-blast plastic and natural zeolite achieved nitrogen and organic removal efficiencies of 99% and 87%, respectively with a fluffy protruding biofilm whereas the particles with average sphericity of 0.5 i.e. maxi-blast plastic and lava rock achieved removals efficiencies of 94% and 77%, respectively with a patchy biofilm. Low biomass yields were observed for multi- blast plastic and natural zeolite with a sphericity of 0.9 of 0.12g VSS/g COD, while the yield for both the maxi-blast plastic and lava rock with sphericities of 0.5 and 0.6 respectively was 0.19 g VSS/g COD. Annualized unit media costs are mostly governed by fluidization energy costs which constitute 76%-97% of the total costs i.e. capital and media replacement costs are insignificant over the long-term. Considering denitrification performance and annualized overall media costs including fluidization energy, media loss, and capital cost, Multi-Blast (MB) plastic particle is the most suitable and economic media for the denitrification process in DFBBR, with a 20 years annualized capital and running cost of $1.56-$1.72 per kg, 30% cheaper than natural zeolite and 50% cheaper than lava rock.
机译:使用造粒MAXI-BLAST塑料四个反硝化流化床生物反应器(DFBBRs),粒状多鼓风塑料,天然沸石和溶岩岩石不同生物颗粒的经济的研究中研究以评估使用这些介质作为载体介质或“生物颗粒”的可行性在流化床生物反应器反硝化作用。工作表明,多鼓风塑料和天然沸石分别而,分别为94%和77%时,MAXI-BLAST塑料和熔岩实现清除效率达到99%和87%,氮和有机物的去除效率。观察到用于多鼓风塑料和0.12克VSS /克COD天然沸石低的生物质的产率,而对于加厚鼓风塑料和熔岩二者岩石产量为0.19克VSS /克COD。每个媒体考虑到初始投资成本,运营和运行成本的流态化能耗的综合经济评价和重置成本表明,多爆炸塑料和马克西爆炸塑料介质比天然沸石和熔岩便宜。考虑每个媒体的平均球形度,具有0.9即,多鼓风塑料和天然沸石实现氮和99%和87%的有机去除率平均球形颗粒,分别与蓬松突出生物膜而用0.5平均球形颗粒即MAXI-BLAST塑料和熔岩有斑片状生物膜达到94%和77%的效率的清除,分别。观察到低的生物量产量为多鼓风塑料和天然沸石,0.12克VSS /克COD,而对于加厚鼓风塑料和熔岩都具有0.5球形度和0.6的产率分别为0.19克VSS 0.9的球形度/克COD。年率单元媒体成本大多是由构成76%的流化的能源成本-97的总成本,即资本和媒体更换成本是微不足道的在长期的%控制。考虑到脱硝性能和年度总媒体费用,包括流态化能源,媒体损失,资金成本,多-BLAST(MB)的塑料颗粒是在DFBBR反硝化过程最合适,最经济的媒体,用20 Years年度资本和运行成本的$ 1.56-每公斤1.72 $,比天然沸石便宜30%,比熔岩便宜50%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号