首页> 外文会议>Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics >Animal welfare in assurance schemes: benchmarking for progress
【24h】

Animal welfare in assurance schemes: benchmarking for progress

机译:保证计划中的动物福利:进度基准

获取原文

摘要

Many, if not all, of the large retail companies run some sort of assurance scheme for their fresh meat and egg products. Other schemes exist, publicly and privately owned. This means that a large part of the animal products available to the consumer are produced under an assurance scheme. Most of these contain a section of animal welfare related requirements. Considerable differences between animal production schemes exist with respect to animal welfare requirements. But, a simple numerical comparison is dangerous, as qualitative differences between schemes and requirements are difficult to code. Assurance schemes are able to deliver an major added value to animal production. Through such a system, important sustainability elements can be enforced across the production chain, and other ethical concepts such as consumer choice and corporate social responsibility can play a more important role in animal production. A more open communication might result in push and pull effects towards better assurance schemes. Improving schemes is not sufficient. Appropriate legislation is indispensable in order to assure that all animals are produced according to decent standards, including those brought to the market as processed products.
机译:许多,如果不是全部,大型零售公司都为他们的新鲜肉类和蛋制品运行了某种保证方案。其他方案存在,公开和私人拥有。这意味着消费者可用的大部分动物产品是在保证方案下生产的。大多数这些都包含一段动物福利相关要求。动物生产方案之间的相当大的差异存在于动物福利要求。但是,简单的数字比较是危险的,因为方案和要求之间的定性差异很难编码。保证计划能够为动物生产提供重大附加值。通过这样的系统,可以在生产链中强制执行重要的可持续性元素,以及其他道德概念,如消费者选择和企业社会责任可以在动物生产中发挥更重要的作用。更开放的通信可能导致推动和拉动效果,以更好的保证方案。提高方案是不够的。适当的立法是必不可少的,以确保所有动物根据体面标准生产,包括将市场带到加工产品的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号