首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Evolving Fuzzy Systems >Comparison of Search Ability between Genetic Fuzzy Rule Selection and Fuzzy Genetics-Based Machine Learning
【24h】

Comparison of Search Ability between Genetic Fuzzy Rule Selection and Fuzzy Genetics-Based Machine Learning

机译:基于遗传模糊规则选择与模糊遗传学机器学习的搜索能力的比较

获取原文

摘要

We developed two GA-based schemes for the design of fuzzy rule-based classification systems. One is genetic rule selection and the other is genetics-based machine learning (GBML). In our genetic rule selection scheme, first a large number of promising fuzzy rules are extracted from numerical data in a heuristic manner as candidate rules. Then a genetic algorithm is used to select a small number of fuzzy rules. A rule set is represented by a binary string whose length is equal to the number of candidate rules. On the other hand, a fuzzy rule is denoted by its antecedent fuzzy sets as an integer substring in our GBML scheme. A rule set is represented by a concatenated integer string. In this paper, we compare these two schemes in terms of their search ability to efficiently find compact fuzzy rule-based classification systems with high accuracy. The main difference between these two schemes is that GBML has a huge search space consisting of all combinations of possible fuzzy rules while genetic rule selection has a much smaller search space with only candidate rules.
机译:我们开发了两个基于GA-方案的模糊规则为基础的分类系统的设计。一个是遗传规律的选择,另一种是基于遗传学的机器学习(GBML)。在我们的遗传规则选择方案中,第一有大量有希望的模糊规则是从数字数据中启发式地作为候选的规则提取。然后遗传算法被用来选择少数模糊规则。规则集是由一个二进制串,其长度等于候选规则的数目来表示。在另一方面,模糊规则是由它的先行词的模糊集合表示为一个整数我们GBML方案串。规则集被级联整数字符串表示。在本文中,我们在他们的搜索能力,有效地找到紧凑模糊规则为基础的分类系统具有高精确度方面这两个方案进行比较。这两个方案之间的主要区别是,GBML具有由可能的模糊规则的所有组合,而遗传规律的选择与唯一的候选规则更小的搜索空间巨大的搜索空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号