首页> 外文会议>American Chemical Society Symposium >Chemical Pest Control Technology: Benefits, Disadvantages, and Continuing Roles in Crop Production Systems
【24h】

Chemical Pest Control Technology: Benefits, Disadvantages, and Continuing Roles in Crop Production Systems

机译:化学害虫控制技术:作物生产系统中的福利,缺点和持续的角色

获取原文

摘要

In the U.S., certified organic agriculture has been clearly demarcated from conventional agriculture by regulatory rules under the National Organic Program. However, neither organic nor conventional agriculture has a clear scientific definition. Froma public perspective, organic agriculture is often defined simplistically and contrasted with conventional agriculture by the non-use of pesticides. Furthermore, organic agriculture is often viewed as the epitome of sustainability. In reality, sustainable practices are not well defined because systems are dynamic and practices must be constantly adapting within the context of changing biotic and abiotic characteristics of a field or landscape. Sustainability is a concept best viewed as a goal of all growers, whether they associate themselves with the terms organic or conventional. Also, practices deployed by organic growers for pest control are increasingly practiced by conventional growers. Examples include the use of crop rotation for controlling soil borne pests (such as the corn rootworms, nematodes, and fungal diseases) and the use of pheromones for mating disruption of moths, especially in tree fruit. Pheromones are but one type of pesticide registered by the EPA and approved for use in certified organic agriculture. Others include certain formulations of spinosad and azadirachtin and certain microbial pesticides based on non-genetically engineered cultures of Bacillus thuringiensis among other species. Considering that many agrichemical companies are now trying to develop and market EPA-approved reduced risk pesticides, a convergence in techniques may be taking place among all types of growers as they seek to manage the same problems consistent with a desire for environmental stewardship. Rather than further differentiate between organic and so-called conventional practices, this chapter seeks to understand common reasons for why growers use pesticides, the advantages and disadvantages of pesticides, and the continuing role of pesticides incrop protection regardless of agronomic practices. Over reliance on singular techniques in any agronomic system may lead to their eventual failure. To be sustainable, pest control must be conducted using the principles of integrated pest management (IPM)as a decision support system. The IPM strategy is based on a confluence of biological and economic information and is implemented by integrating multiple compatible control tactics.
机译:在美国,通过国家有机计划下的监管规则已从常规农业中明确划定了认证的有机农业。然而,有机或常规农业都没有明确的科学定义。从公开的角度来看,有机农业通常通过非使用杀虫剂简单地定义和与常规农业形成鲜明对比。此外,有机农业通常被视为可持续性的缩影。实际上,可持续的做法没有明确定义,因为系统是动态的,并且实践必须在改变场景或景观的生物和非生物学特征的背景下不断适应。可持续性是一个最能成为所有种植者的目标的概念,他们是否将自己与有机或常规的术语联系起来。此外,常规种植者越来越多地实践由有机种植者进行的有机种植者部署的实践。实例包括使用作物旋转来控制土壤源性害虫(如玉米根虫,线虫和真菌疾病)以及使用信息素来交配蛾的破坏,特别是在树果上。信息素仅是EPA注册的一种类型的农药,并批准用于经过认证的有机农业。其他包括基于其他物种中的芽孢杆菌的非遗传工程培养物的多种血管生成和某些微生物杀虫剂的某些配方。考虑到,许多农业公司现在正在努力开发和市场批准的风险农药,在所有类型的种植者中可能会在各种种植者中举行技术融合,因为他们寻求管理与环境管理欲望一致的同样问题。这一章而不是进一步区分有机物和所谓的传统实践,而是旨在了解种植者使用农药,农药的优缺点以及杀虫剂的持续作用,以及农艺法的持续作用。过度依赖于任何农艺系统中的奇异技术可能导致他们的最终失败。为了可持续,必须使用综合害虫管理(IPM)作为决策支持系统的原则进行害虫控制。 IPM策略基于生物学和经济信息的汇合,并通过整合多个兼容的控制策略来实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号