首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Agricultural Research >Understanding the need for transfer of biologically-based crop protection technology for soil pest control in vegetable production in Rwanda
【24h】

Understanding the need for transfer of biologically-based crop protection technology for soil pest control in vegetable production in Rwanda

机译:了解在卢旺达蔬菜生产中转移基于生物的农作物保护技术以控制土壤害虫的必要性

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite growth in Rwanda’s agricultural production ability, with food crops representing 33% of the National GDP and 80% of the population reliant on agriculture, food supply remains fragile. A factor which has significant impact on productivity is soil pests, whose effects filter through the whole value chain. Poor yields result in demand that exceeds supply, leading to higher food prices and reduced affordability by the poor. Poor quality products result in lower consumer acceptability and short shelf life. Rwandan farmers have limited access to plant protection products. A survey of farmers conducted in 2008 revealed that only 16% of the households use pesticides and few use other products for soil pest control. This paper examined the existing vegetable production situation, major soil pests for vegetables and the needs of the farmers in respect to soil pests’ management in Rwanda in 2014. From interviews of 110 vegetable farmers and 18 key informants, it was established that the main vegetable crops were cassava, beans, Irish potatoes and cabbages. The main method for vegetable production was intercropping. Production of vegetables was not intensive as evidenced by the limited use of high value inputs such as fertilizers and crop protection chemicals. The vegetable production constraints starting from the most serious were insect pests, diseases, lack of high quality seeds, high cost of pesticides and fertilizers. The key insect pests were white grubs, cutworms, termites and bean fly. Most of the farmers (76%) did not control the insect pests due to lack of knowledge, lack of alternative methods for pest management and high cost of pest control products especially the chemical pesticides. Chemical pesticides were reported as the main control method by 55% of those who controlled insect pests. This translates to only 13% of the farmers reporting use of chemical pesticides to control insect pests. This represents a 3% decline in the already low (16%) use of chemical pesticides to control insect pests. Conversely, pest infestation levels have been increasing over time. Diversification of the pest control methods is therefore warranted and has indeed been lauded as a key approach to improving pest control. Biologically-based crop protection technology using entomopathogenic nematodes is critical for improving insect pest control. This is due to the possibility of the technology being maintained over a large area without major efforts on the part of the already financially resource poor farmers. Facilitating access to information about the sources of the biologically-based insect pest control technology can enhance diversification of the insect control methods.
机译:尽管卢旺达的农业生产能力有所提高,粮食作物占国民生产总值的33%,80%的人口依赖农业,但粮食供应仍然脆弱。对生产力产生重大影响的一个因素是土壤病虫害,其影响贯穿整个价值链。单产低下导致需求超过供应,导致粮食价格上涨,穷人的承受能力下降。劣质产品会降低消费者的接受度并缩短保质期。卢旺达农民获得植物保护产品的机会有限。 2008年对农民进行的一项调查显示,只有16%的家庭使用农药,很少使用其他产品防治土壤病虫害。本文回顾了2014年卢旺达蔬菜生产的现状,蔬菜中主要的土壤病虫害以及农民对土壤病虫害管理的需求。通过对110名蔬菜农和18位关键信息提供者的访谈,确定了主要蔬菜农作物有木薯,豆类,爱尔兰土豆和白菜。蔬菜生产的主要方法是套种。蔬菜的生产并不集约化,如肥料和农作物保护化学品等高价值投入品的有限使用所证明的。从最严重的问题开始的蔬菜生产制约因素是虫害,疾病,缺乏优质种子,农药和化肥成本高昂。主要害虫为白white,地老虎,白蚁和豆蝇。大多数农民(76%)由于缺乏知识,缺乏有害生物管理替代方法以及有害生物防治产品特别是化学农药的高昂成本而无法控制有害生物。据报告,化学杀虫剂是控制虫害的55%的主要防治方法。这意味着只有13%的农民报告使用化学农药控制害虫。这表示化学农药控制虫害的使用量已经很低(16%)下降了3%。相反,随着时间的流逝,害虫的侵害水平一直在增加。因此,有害生物控制方法的多样化是有保证的,并且确实被誉为改善有害生物控制的关键方法。使用昆虫病原线虫的基于生物的作物保护技术对于改善害虫防治至关重要。这是由于该技术可以在大范围内得到维护,而对于已经有经济能力的贫困农民而言,却无需付出巨大的努力。便利获取有关基于生物的害虫防治技术来源的信息,可以促进昆虫防治方法的多样化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号