首页> 外文会议>North American Conference on Agile Software Development >What Are We Arguing About? A Framework for Defining Agile in our Organization
【24h】

What Are We Arguing About? A Framework for Defining Agile in our Organization

机译:我们在争论什么?在我们的组织中定义敏捷的框架

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

How do we implement Agile? Is Agile a good thing for my organization? What barriers will I have to overcome? All of these are important questions when deciding whether and how to apply Agile Software Development to an organization that is used to working in a different way. To enable a good discussion, the language of that discussion must be established. As Medtronic adopted Agile, we realized how important it was to put effort into the language. We established a framework for that language, organizing our thoughts into three areas: Principles, Practices, and Benefits. When talking with visionaries or evangelists, we speak in terms of principles to understand why Agile is the way it is. With practitioners or pragmatists, we speak in terms of Practices to understand how to do Agile. With skeptics, we speak in terms of benefits to determine whether Agile is a good thing for us. In most cases, an effective conversation needs to address all three perspectives. The framework and language help us determine whether issues are related simply to communication barriers, or are related to the decisions of whether and how to apply Agile to our world.
机译:我们如何实施敏捷?敏捷是我组织的好处吗?我必须克服什么障碍?在决定是否以及如何将Agile软件开发应用于用于以不同方式工作的组织应用敏捷软件开发时,所有这些都是重要的问题。为了实现良好的讨论,必须建立该讨论的语言。正如Medtronic采用敏捷,我们意识到将努力投入语言的重要性。我们为该语言建立了一个框架,将我们的思想组织成三个方面:原则,实践和福利。在与Visionaries或福音传教士交谈时,我们在原则方面发言,了解为什么敏捷是它的方式。与从业者或实用主义者,我们在做法方面发言,了解如何做敏捷。有了怀疑论者,我们在福利方面说话,以确定敏捷是我们的好处。在大多数情况下,有效的对话需要解决所有三个观点。该框架和语言有助于我们确定问题是否只是与沟通障碍相关,或者与如何以及如何向我们的世界应用敏捷的决定有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号