【24h】

Benchmarking, Asset Potential and Digital Energy

机译:基准,资产潜力和数字能源

获取原文

摘要

Because digital-energy (DE) projects are intended to improve performaance, both a normalized baseline describing existing conditions and targets (generally set by management) for future improvement are necessary. Today, only a few assets capture enough data to fully understand the status of operational activities or too quantify optimum reservoir behavior. A benchmark, or baseline, prrovides a way for companies to identify "where they are" and helps justify DE investments by tracking improvement. To optimize returns, asset potential should be established before appropriate targets are set. DE business impact (the difference between baseline and potential) may then be adequately evaluateed. Deviation from ideal performance may be a result of equipment limitations, facility availability and uptime, administrative or operational bottlenecks, fluid behavior, weather, employee skill set, and numerous other factors. Differences between assets may be attributed to artificial-lift cost variations, local economic conditions, onshore/offshore, lifecycle stage, asset type (shale, waterflood, deep water, coalbed methane, etc.), produced fluid, and many others. Refining faces equally diverse problems and has taken the necessary steps to address this challenge by applying benchmarking with commercial tools, such as the Solomon Associates Indices, for ranking and comparing different refineries. For E&P, an initial external benchmarking framework based on public data (annual reports, EIA, 10Ks, IHS, etc.) will be discussed so that high-level performance metrics can be evaluateed. By developing a similar approach using proprietary and internal data, companies can beegin to understand asset performance in detail and rank assets not only within an organization but also aacross company boundaries based on t operational efficiency and effectiveness. Prioritizing DE projects based on their contribution also becomes possible. As DE projects are deployed, the benchmarks can be refined and updated for greeater accuracy. If the framework is properly designed, a company can see where gains are possible and adapt future programs to concentrate on areas where the most value can be derived, regardless of asset type, which will permit a company to forecast benefits and predict how effective a DE initiative could bee.
机译:由于数字能量(DE)项目旨在改善表现,所以必须为未来改进的现有条件和目标(通常由管理设定)的标准化基线。今天,只有少数资产捕获足够的数据以充分了解运营活动的状态或过量地量化最佳油藏行为。基准或基线,普遍为公司识别“他们所在的地方”,并通过跟踪改进来帮助证明De Investment。要优化返回,应在设置适当的目标之前建立资产潜力。然后可以充分评估DE业务影响(基线和潜力之间的差异)。偏离理想性能可能是设备限制,设施可用性和正常运行时间,行政或运营瓶颈,流体行为,天气,员工技能集以及许多其他因素的结果。资产之间的差异可能归因于人工升降成本变化,地方经济条件,陆上/海上,生命周期,资产类型(页岩,水运,深水,煤层甲烷等),产生的液体和许多其他人。精炼面孔同样多样化的问题,并通过使用与商业工具(如所罗门员工指数)应用基准,以便排名和比较不同的炼油厂来解决这一挑战的必要步骤。对于E&P,将讨论基于公共数据的初始外部基准框架(年度报告,EIA,10ks,IHS等),以便可以评估高级性能指标。通过使用专有和内部数据的开发类似的方法,公司可以通过组织内容详细了解资产绩效,并不仅在组织内,还基于T运算效率和有效性的AACROSS公司边界。基于其贡献的优先考虑DE项目也是可能的。随着DE项目部署,可以精制和更新基准,以获得用于Greeater精度。如果框架被正确设计,一家公司可以看到增长的地方可以在哪里,并适应未来的程序,以集中在最具价值的区域,无论资产类型如何,这将允许公司预测福利并预测DE的效益和预测如何效益倡议可以蜜蜂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号