首页> 外文会议>American Society of Mining and Reclamation National Conference >COMPARISON OF MINE WASTE ASSESSMENT METHODS AT THE RATTLER MINE SITE, VIRGINIA CANYON, COLORADO
【24h】

COMPARISON OF MINE WASTE ASSESSMENT METHODS AT THE RATTLER MINE SITE, VIRGINIA CANYON, COLORADO

机译:Colorado野狗矿场地雷矿山矿山矿山矿井垃圾评估方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

In a joint project, the mine waste-piles at the Rattler Mine near Idaho Springs, Colorado, were sampled and analyzed by scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Separate sample collection, sample leaching, and leachate analyses were performed by both groups and the results were compared. For the study, both groups used the USGS sampling procedure and the USGS Field Leach Test (FLT). The leachates generated from these tests were analyzed for a suite of elements using ICP-AES (CSM) and ICP-MS (USGS). Leachate geochemical fingerprints produced by the two groups for composites collected from the same mine waste showed good agreement. In another set of tests, CSM collected another set of Rattler mine waste composite samples using the USGS sampling procedure. This set of composite samples was leached using the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) leach test, and a modified Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) leach test. Leachate geochemical fingerprints produced using these tests showed a variation of more than a factor of two from the geochemical fingerprints produced using the USGS FLT leach test. We have concluded that the variation in the results is due to the different parameters of the leaching tests and not due to the sampling or analytical methods.
机译:在一个联合项目中,科罗拉多州位于爱达荷州斯普林斯附近的Rattler矿的矿井废物堆被美国地质调查(USGS)和科罗拉多院(CSM)的科学家对科学家进行了采样和分析。通过两组进行单独的样品收集,样品浸出和渗滤液分析,并比较结果。对于该研究,这两组都使用USGS采样程序和USGS字段浸出测试(FLT)。使用ICP-AES(CSM)和ICP-MS(USGS)分析由这些测试产生的渗滤液进行分析为一套元素。由来自同一矿井废物收集的复合材料的两组产生的渗滤液地球化学指纹显示出良好的一致性。在另一套测试中,CSM使用USGS采样程序收集了另一套藤发矿废物复合材料样品。使用矿物质和地质(CDMG)浸出试验的科罗拉多划分和改性毒性特征浸出程序(TCLP)浸出试验,浸出这组复合样品。使用这些测试产生的渗滤液地球化学指纹显示使用USGS FLT Leach测试产生的地球化学指纹的两个以上的变化。我们已经得出结论,结果的变化是由于浸出试验的不同参数而不是由于采样或分析方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号