首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Comparison of different static methods for assessment of AMD generation potential in mining waste dumps in the Muteh Gold Mines, Iran
【24h】

Comparison of different static methods for assessment of AMD generation potential in mining waste dumps in the Muteh Gold Mines, Iran

机译:评估伊朗Muteh金矿的采矿废料场中产生AMD潜力的不同静态方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Acid mine drainage (AMD) gives rise to several problems in sulfide-bearing mineral depositswhether in an ore body or in the mining wastes and tailings. Hence, several methods and parameters have been proposed to evaluate the acid-producing and acidneutralizing potential of a material. This research compares common static methods for evaluation of acidproduction potential ofmining wastes in the Muteh gold mines by using 62 samples taken from six waste dumps around Senjedeh and Chah-Khatoun mines. According to a detailed mineralogical study, the waste materials are composed of mica-schist and quartz veins with a high amount of pyrite and are supposed to be susceptible to acid production, and upon a rainfall, they release acid drainage. All parameters introduced in different methods were calculated and compared in this research in order to predict the acid-generating and neutralization potential, including APP, NNP, MPA, NPR, and NAGpH. Based on the analytical results and calculation of different parameters, all methods are in a general consensus that DWS-02 and DWS-03 waste dumps are acid-forming which is clearly attributed to high content of pyrite in samples. DWS-04 is considered as non-acid forming in all methods except method 8 which is uncertain about its acid-forming potential and method 7 which considers a low potential for it. DWC-01 is acid-forming based on all methods except 8, 9, 10, and 11 which are also uncertain about its potential. The methods used are not reached to a compromise on DWS-01 and DWC-02 waste dumps. It is supposed that method 7 gives the conservationist results in all cases. Method 8 is unable to decide on some cases. It is recommended to use and rely on results provided by methods 1, 2, 3, and 12 for taking decisions for further studies. Therefore, according to the static tests used, the aforementioned criteria in selected methods can be used with much confidence as a rule of thumb estimation.
机译:酸性矿山排水(AMD)在矿体或采矿废料和尾矿中都产生了含硫化物矿床中的几个问题。因此,已经提出了几种方法和参数来评估材料的产酸和中和酸的潜力。这项研究使用从Senjedeh和Chah-Khatoun矿周围的六个废料场中采集的62个样本,比较了评估Muteh金矿中采矿废料产酸潜力的常规静态方法。根据详细的矿物学研究,废料由云母片岩和石英脉组成,具有大量的黄铁矿,被认为容易产生酸,并且在降雨时会释放出酸。为了预测产酸和中和的潜力,计算并比较了用不同方法引入的所有参数,包括APP,NNP,MPA,NPR和NAGpH。根据分析结果和不同参数的计算,所有方法都普遍认为DWS-02和DWS-03垃圾场是成酸的,这显然归因于样品中黄铁矿的含量高。 DWS-04在所有方法中均被视为非酸形成方法,但方法8不确定其酸形成潜力,而方法7认为其低酸形成能力。 DWC-01除8、9、10和11以外的所有方法均会形成酸,这也不确定其潜力。在DWS-01和DWC-02废物堆上未达到折衷的使用方法。假定方法7在所有情况下都能给出保护主义者的结果。方法8无法确定某些情况。建议使用并依靠方法1、2、3和12提供的结果来做出进一步研究的决定。因此,根据所使用的静态测试,可以将所选标准中的上述标准作为经验估算的规则,可以很有把握地使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号