【24h】

EC2000: What to Expect/ What is Expected?

机译:EC2000:期待什么/预期的内容?

获取原文

摘要

All U.S. engineering programs, except those with outstanding conventional criteria issues (show cause or interim evaluations) should now be on board with Engineering Criteria 2000. As of Fall, 2001, these are now the standard for accreditation, yet institutions are still at varying levels of preparedness and willingness to be evaluated under these criteria. This paper summarizes the observations I have made on the EC2000 transition process both from the program's and ABET's perspectives. Information from EC2000 visits, ABET reports, workshops, and discussions in the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET have contributed to these observations. The focus of this paper is mainly on Criterion 3 issues, with some commentary on Criterion 2 and Criterion 4. These three criteria are the focus of most discussion in journal articles, workshops, conferences, team visits, and ABET training. The other five criteria are more familiar and are more routinely part of current practice in engineering programs. The purpose of this paper is to make observations and sensitize readers to commonly observed problems in the implementation of EC2000 within engineering programs and within ABET. The purpose is not to offer solutions to all the problems, but specific suggestions are provided in some instances.
机译:除了具有出色的传统标准问题(显示原因或临时评估)外,所有美国工程计划都应与2000年工程标准载有船上。截至2001年秋季,这些目前是认证的标准,但机构仍处于不同层面在这些标准下进行评估的准备和意愿。本文总结了我对欧洲委员会和ABET的角度来对EC2000过渡过程进行的观察结果。来自EC2000的信息访问,ABET报告,研讨会和ABET工程认证委员会(EAC)的讨论促成了这些观察。本文的重点主要是标准3个问题,有一些评论标准2和标准4.这三个标准是大多数讨论的重点是日记文章,研讨会,会议,团队访问和儿童培训。另外五个标准更熟悉,更常然的工程计划中实践的一部分。本文的目的是使读者宣传读者在工程方案中和ABET中实施EC2000的常见问题。目的不是为所有问题提供解决方案,但在某些情况下提供了具体的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号